An awful lot of natural maps
There are a bunch of natural (in both senses) maps we can consider now. Some look all but tautological over , and we may have used them in the past without comment. In the enriched context, though, we should go over them.
- The family of arrows
is extraordinarily
-natural exactly when
is
-natural.
- For a
-functor
, the map
is natural in both
and
.
- Similarly, if
is a
-functor, then
is
-natural. And it’s also natural in
.
- In particular,
is natural in all three variables.
- Putting together naturalities 1 and 4 tells us that for a morphism
, the transformation
is natural.
- The “evaluation”
is natural in both variables.
- Since we built compositions from evaluations and the closure adjunction, the arrow
is natural in all variables.
- The identity functor on
has an identity natural transformation, so by naturality 1 we see that
is natural.
- All the monoidal structural isomorphisms —
,
,
, and
— are natural in all variables.
- We can start with
and hit it with
to get
. Then we can evaluate to get
. This is an isomorphism we call
, corresponding to the adjunction
, and it’s natural in all variables.
- We can compose the following arrows:
and we get the “coevaluation”
— the counit of the closure adjunction. And thus the coevaluation is
-natural in all variables.
- We can compose the coevaluation
, and then use the right unit isomorphism to get a
-natural isomorphism
.
- In general, a family
is
-natural in any of its variables if the corresponding variables are natural in
Whew. That’s a mouthful. It can be instructive to sit down and try to interpret some of these in the context of categories enriched over , so when you recover I’d advise taking a look at that.
No comments yet.
