## Continuity redux

So now we have two new ways to talk about topologies: neighborhoods, and closure operators. We can turn around and talk about continuity directly in our new languages, rather than translating them into the open set definition we started with.

First let’s tackle neighborhoods. Remember that a continuous function from a topological space to is one which pulls back open sets. That is, to every open set there is an open set which sends into . But in the neighborhood definition we don’t have open sets at the beginning; we just have neighborhoods of points.

What we do is notice that a neighborhood of a point is a set which contains an open set containing . In particular we can consider neighborhoods of a point . The the preimage is an open set containing , which is a neighborhood! So, given a neighborhood of there is a neighborhood of so that . This is an implication of the definition of continuity written in the language of neighborhoods, and it turns out that we can turn around and derive our definition of continuity from this condition.

To this end, we consider sets and with neighborhood systems and , respectively. We will say that a function is continuous at if for every neighborhood there is a neighborhood so that , and that is continuous if it is continuous at each point in .

Now, let be an open set in . That is, a set which is a neighborhood of each of its points. We must now show that is a neighborhood of each of *its* points. So consider such a point , and its image Since we are assuming that is a neighborhood of , there must be a neighborhood of so that . But then , and since the neighborhoods of form a filter this means is a neighborhood as well. Thus the preimage of an open set is open.

In particular, we can consider a set and its interior , which is an open set contained in . And so its preimage is an open set contained in . Thus we see that . Finally, we can dualize this property to see that . That is, the image of the closure of is contained in the closure of the image of for all subsets . Let’s now take this as our definition of continuity, and derive the original definition from it.

Well, first let’s just dualize this condition to get back to say that for all sets . Now any open set is its own interior, so . But by the definition of the interior. And so is its own interior, and is thus open.

[...] the bars denote the norm in one or the other of the spaces or as depends on context. Again, the idea is that if we pick a metric ball around , we can find some metric ball around whose image is [...]

Pingback by Multivariable Continuity « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 16, 2009 |

[...] restate our condition for continuity, and it works either using the metric space definition or the neighborhood definition of continuity. I’ll work it out in the latter case for generality, but it’s worth [...]

Pingback by Oscillation « The Unapologetic Mathematician | December 7, 2009 |