The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

Another Carnival

The Secret Blogging Seminar is hosting the latest installment of the Carnival of Mathematics. They seem to have done a fair job of collecting links, with more (and more varied) entries than I remember seeing before. Enjoy.

About these ads

December 2, 2007 - Posted by | Uncategorized

3 Comments »

  1. John, I have appreciated your help in the past and I would like to get your insight into yet another question I have concerning linear algebra.

    What is the relationship between the set of all linear transformations on a vector space over a field F of dimension n and the set of all nxn matrices with entries from the same field F. Clearly, it is not a one-to-one relation. There may be many, possibly an infinite number of matrices that can represent the same linear transformation with respect to different basis of the space. What exactly is the relation?

    Thank you for your time,

    Jonathan Greenberg

    Comment by Jonathan Grennberg | December 11, 2007 | Reply

  2. When you’re dealing with R-linear functions between free R-modules (all vector spaces — modules over a field — are free), you can pick a basis for each of the domain and range as I discuss here. Once you do, then any such linear transformation can be written down uniquely as a matrix with respect to those bases, as I discuss in that link. Also, given a choice of bases any matrix corresponds to exactly one linear transformation.

    But as you notice, there’s that choice of basis. Changing the basis of a free module is the same as applying an invertible linear transformation from that module to itself. That is, \hom(R^m,R^n) is the space of linear transformations from a rank m module to a rank n module. Then there is an action of the group \mathrm{GL}(m,R) (invertible m\times m matrices with entries in R) on the one side, and an action of \mathrm{GL}(n,R) on the other. What you’re really asking about is what the set of transformations looks like once we quotient out by these group actions.

    And that’s where the story gets complicated. Over an algebraically closed field (like the complex numbers), the answer is contained in the Jordan normal form, which is a standard part of any good senior-level linear algebra course. It gives a canonical representative of each orbit of the group action. Beyond that it’s a huge mess. Sorry I can’t be more accurate.

    Comment by John Armstrong | December 11, 2007 | Reply

  3. John, thank you for your insight into my question. I will have to think about your answer as I study linear algebra in more depth.

    JG

    Comment by Jonathan Greenberg | December 11, 2007 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 392 other followers

%d bloggers like this: