## Functions of Bounded Variation III

I’ve been busy the last couple of days, so this post got delayed a bit.

We continue our study of functions of bounded variation by showing that total variation is “additive” over its interval. That is, if is of bounded variation on and , then is of bounded variation on and on . Further, we have .

First, let’s say we’ve got a partition of and a partition of . Then together they form a partition of . The sum for both partitions together must be bounded by , and so the sum of each partition is also bounded by this total variation. Thus is of bounded variation on each subinterval. This also establishes the inequality .

On the other hand, given any partition at all of we can add the point to it. This may split one of the parts of the partition, and thus increase the sum for that partition. Then we can break this new partition into a partition for and a partition for . The first will have a sum bounded by , and the second a sum bounded by . Thus we find that .

So, with both of these inequalities we have established the equality we wanted. Now we can define the “variation function” on the interval . Just set (and ). It turns out that both and are increasing functions on .

Indeed, given points in we can see that , and so . On the other hand, . But by definition we must have ! And so .

Given a function of bounded variation, we have constructed two increasing functions and . It is easily seen that , so any function of bounded variation is the difference between two increasing functions. On the other hand, we know that increasing functions are of bounded variation. And we also know that the difference of two functions of bounded variation is also of bounded variation. And so the difference between two increasing functions is a function of bounded variation. Thus this condition is both necessary and sufficient!

Even better, since many situations behave nicely with respect to differences of functions, it’s often enough to understand how increasing functions behave. Then we can understand the behavior of functions of bounded variation just by taking differences. For example, we started talking about functions of bounded variation to discuss integrators in Riemann-Stieltjes integrals. If we study these integrals when is increasing, then we can use the linearity of the integral with respect to the integrator to understand what happens when is of bounded variation!

[...] Variation addenda I left a few things out of last Saturday’s post. Since I’ve spent all morning finishing off that paper (I’ll post the arXiv link [...]

Pingback by Bounded Variation addenda « The Unapologetic Mathematician | March 11, 2008 |

[...] back when we originally discussed integrators of bounded variation, we can write our integrator as the difference of two increasing functions. It’s no loss of generality, then, to assume that is increasing. We also remember that the [...]

Pingback by Continuity of Partial Integrals « The Unapologetic Mathematician | January 12, 2010 |

[...] is sort of like how we found that functions of bounded variation can be written as the difference between two strictly increasing func…. In fact, if we’re loose about what we mean by “function”, and [...]

Pingback by Positive and Negative Parts of Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 7, 2010 |

hi , i am aya from egypt .it is good but i want to know how to construct a partition

to prove that a function is of bounded variation or not

and i have some problems that i cannot solve or at least have some idea about the solution via f(x)=(sin x)^2 on the interval [0,3.14].

thanks a lot

Comment by aya mohamed hussein | October 24, 2010 |

That function is pretty clearly continuous on the given interval. That should at least tell you the direction to try to prove.

Comment by John Armstrong | October 24, 2010 |