Differentiable Exponential Functions
The exponential property is actually a rather stringent condition on a differentiable function . Let’s start by assuming that
is a differentiable exponential function and see what happens.
We calculate the derivative as usual by taking the limit of the difference quotient
Then the exponential property says that our derivative is
So we have a tight relationship between the function and its own derivative. Let’s see what happens for the exponential function . Since it’s the functional inverse of
we can use the chain rule to calculate
Showing that this function is its own derivative. That is, this is the exponential function with .
Since a general (differentiable) exponential function is a homomorphism from the additive group of reals to the multiplicative group of positive reals, we can follow it by the natural logarithm. This gives a differentiable homomorphism from the additive reals to themselves, which must be multiplication by some constant
. That is:
. How can we calculate this constant? Take derivatives!
So our constant is the derivative from before. Of course we could also write
And since is invertible this tells us that
. That is, every differentiable exponential function comes from
by taking some constant multiple of the input.
By the usual yoga of inverse functions we can then see that every differentiable logarithmic function (an inverse to some differentiable exponential function) is a constant multiple of the natural logarithm . That is, if
satisfies the logarithmic property, then
The Exponential Property
We’ve defined the natural logarithm and shown that it is, in fact, a logarithm. That is, it’s a homomorphism from the multiplicative group of positive real numbers to the additive group of all real numbers. Now I assert that this function is in fact an isomorphism.
First off, the derivative of is
, which is always positive for positive
. Thus it’s always strictly increasing. That is, if
then
. So no two distinct numbers ever have the same natural logarithm, and the function is thus injective.
Flipping this around tells us that we definitely have some nonzero values for the function. For example, we know that . Now, since the real numbers are an Archimedean field, no matter how big a number
we pick, there will be some natural number
so that
, where the latter inequality follows from the logarithmic property.
That is, no matter how large a number we pick, takes values at least that large. But because
is continuous on a connected interval there must be some number
with
. Similarly, if
then there will be some
with
, and thus
. Thus the natural logarithm is surjective.
So, since our function is one-to-one and onto, it has an inverse function. We will call this function the “exponential” (denoted ), and define it to be the unique function satisfying
for all positive real and all real
.
From here it’s straightforward to see that must be the inverse homomorphism. That is, given two real numbers
and
we know there must be (unique!) positive real numbers
and
with
. Then we calculate
And it’s clear from here that . A homomorphism from the additive reals to the multiplicative positive reals like this is said to satisfy the “exponential property”, which is just the reverse of the logarithmic property from last time.
