The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

Differentiable Convex Functions

We showed that all convex functions are continuous. Now let’s assume that we’ve got one that’s differentiable too. Actually, this isn’t a very big imposition. It turns out that a result called Rademacher’s Theorem will tell us that any Lipschitz function is differentiable “almost everywhere”.

Okay, so what does differentiability mean? Remember our secant-slope function:

\displaystyle s(\left[a,b\right])=\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}

Differentiability says that as we shrink the interval \left[a,b\right] down to a single point c the function has a limit, and that limit is f'(c).

So now take a<b. We can pick a c between them and points x and y so that a<x<c<y<b. Now we compare slopes to find

s(\left[a,x\right])\leq s(\left[a,c\right])\leq s(\left[c,b\right])\leq s(\left[y,b\right])

so as we let x approach a and y approach b we find

f'(a)\leq s(\left[a,c\right])\leq s(\left[c,b\right])\leq f'(b)

And so the derivative of f must be nondecreasing.

Let’s look at the statement f'(a)\leq s(\left[a,x\right]) a little more closely. We can expand this out to say

\displaystyle f'(a)\leq\frac{f(x)-f(a)}{x-a}

which we can rewrite as f(a)+f'(x)(x-a)\leq f(x). That is, while the function lies below any of its secants it lies above any of its tangents. In particular, if we have a local minimum where f'(a)=0 then f(a)\leq f(x), and the point is also a global minimum.

If the derivative f'(x) is itself differentiable, then the differential mean-value theorem tells us that f''(x)\geq0 since f'(x) is nondecreasing. This leads us back to the second derivative test to distinguish maxima and minima, since a function is convex near a local minimum.

About these ads

April 16, 2008 - Posted by | Analysis, Calculus

4 Comments »

  1. Actually, any convex function defined on an interval, is differentiable everywhere except on at most countable set (exercise).

    Comment by misha | April 16, 2008 | Reply

  2. I know it’s you, Michael, and you haven’t said anything I haven’t more-or-less already said myself. Yesterday I showed that convex functions are Lipschitz (throwing a sop to you in the process) and today I mentioned Rademacher’s theorem.

    Comment by John Armstrong | April 17, 2008 | Reply

  3. Yeah, I noticed the sop, thanks, but “more-or-less” is the point here. Rademacher’s theorem is rather involved, and my remark is quite elementary, and makes a nice exercise for an interested reader of your blog. Besides, “except on at most countable set” is stronger than “almost everywhere,” since not all sets of measure zero are countable. In fact, it is true that the derivative of a convex function on an interval is continuous on its definition domain, and it’s another exercise, still rather simple.

    Comment by misha | April 17, 2008 | Reply

  4. it really good. it increases me knowledge

    Comment by saeed | August 21, 2009 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 391 other followers

%d bloggers like this: