## Absolute Convergence

Let’s apply one of the tests from last time. Let be a nondecreasing integrator on the ray , and be any function integrable with respect to through the whole ray. Then if the improper integral converges, then so does .

To see this, notice that , and so . Then since converges we see that converges. Subtracting off the integral of we get our result. (Technically to do this, we need to extend the linearity properties of Riemann-Stieltjes integrals to improper integrals, but this is straightforward).

When the integral of converges like this, we say that the integral of is “absolutely convergent”. The above theorem shows us that absolute convergence implies convergence, but it doesn’t necessarily hold the other way around. If the integral of converges, but that of doesn’t, we say that the former is “conditionally convergent”.

[...] also can import the notion of absolute convergence. We say that a series is absolutely convergent if the series is convergent (which implies that [...]

Pingback by Convergence Tests for Infinite Series « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 25, 2008 |

[...] Ratio and Root Tests Now I want to bring out with two tests that will tell us about absolute convergence or (unconditional) divergence of an infinite series . As such they’ll tell us nothing about [...]

Pingback by The Ratio and Root Tests « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 5, 2008 |

[...] integral, we have analogues of the direct comparison and limit comparison tests, and of the idea of absolute convergence. Each of these is exactly the same as before, replacing limits as approaches with limits as [...]

Pingback by Improper Integrals II « The Unapologetic Mathematician | January 15, 2010 |