Derivatives of Power Series
The uniform convergence of a power series establishes that the function it represents must be continuous. Not only that, but it turns out that the limiting function must be differentiable.
A side note here: we define the derivative of a complex function by exactly the same limit of a difference quotient as before. There’s a lot to be said about derivatives of complex functions, but we’ll set the rest aside until later.
Now, to be specific: if the power series converges for
to a function
, then
has a derivative
, which itself has a power series expansion
which converges within the same radius .
Given a point within
of
, we can expand
as a power series about
:
convergent within some radius of
. Then for
in this smaller disk of convergence we have
by manipulations we know to work for series. Then the series on the right must converge to a continuous function, and continuity tells us that each term vanishes as approaches
. Thus
exists and equals
. But our formula for
tells us
Finally, we can apply the root test again. The terms are now . Since the first radical expression goes to
, the limit superior is the same as in the original series for
:
. Thus the derived series has the same radius of convergence.
Notice now that we can apply the exact same reasoning to , and find that it has a derivative
, which has a power series expansion
which again converges within the same radius. And so on, we determine that the limiting function of the power series has derivatives of arbitrarily large orders.

How did you obtain the equation of:
Since
about
, the above becomes
which is different from your result.
Where do you get that
? I just gave the power series expansion about
, which clearly indicates that
.
[...] Okay, we know that power series define functions, and that the functions so defined have derivatives, which have power series expansions. And thus these derivatives have derivatives themselves, and so [...]
Pingback by Analytic Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 27, 2008 |