## Kernels and Images of Intertwiners

The next obvious things to consider are the kernel and the image of an intertwining map. So let’s say we’ve got a representation , a representation , and an intertwiner defined by the linear map which satisfies for all .

Now the linear map immediately gives us two subspaces: the kernel and the image . And it turns out that each of these is actually a subrepresentation. Showing this isn’t difficult. A subrepresentation is just a subspace that gets sent to itself under the action on the whole space, so we just have to check that always sends vectors in back to this subspace, and that always sends vectors in back into *this* subspace.

First off, is in the kernel of if . Then we calculate

which shoes that is also in the kernel of .

On the other hand, if is in the image of , then there is some so that . We calculate

And so is also in the image of .

So we’ve seen that the image and kernel of an intertwining map have well-defined actions of , and so we have subrepresentations. Immediately we can conclude that the coimage and the cokernel are quotient representations.

[...] First of all, the intertwiners between any two representations form a vector space, which is really an abelian group plus stuff. Since the composition of intertwiners is bilinear, this makes into an -category. Secondly, we can take direct sums of representations, which is a categorical biproduct. Thirdly, every intertwiner has a kernel and a cokernel. [...]

Pingback by The Category of Representations is Abelian « The Unapologetic Mathematician | December 15, 2008 |

[...] and a representation of , which actions commute with each other. Our antisymmetric tensors are the image of a certain action from the symmetric group, which is an intertwiner of the action. Thus we have [...]

Pingback by The Determinant « The Unapologetic Mathematician | December 31, 2008 |