The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

Lincoln’s Bicentennial

Everyone else is writing about Charles Darwin. I want to point out something about Abraham Lincoln.

It’s said that he carried three books with him, particularly as a young itinerant lawyer. The Bible is a given. A collection of Shakespeare isn’t unexpected, considering his practiced ease with language. But the third? Lincoln studied Euclid, and carried a copy of the Elements. His law partner tells of Lincoln stretched out on the floor, reading geometry in the lamplight.

Lincoln himself explained his interest:

In the course of my law reading I constantly came upon the word “demonstrate”. I thought at first that I understood its meaning, but soon became satisfied that I did not. I said to myself, What do I do when I demonstrate more than when I reason or prove? How does demonstration differ from any other proof?

I consulted Webster’s Dictionary. They told of ‘certain proof,’ ‘proof beyond the possibility of doubt’; but I could form no idea of what sort of proof that was. I thought a great many things were proved beyond the possibility of doubt, without recourse to any such extraordinary process of reasoning as I understood demonstration to be. I consulted all the dictionaries and books of reference I could find, but with no better results. You might as well have defined blue to a blind man.

At last I said,- Lincoln, you never can make a lawyer if you do not understand what demonstrate means; and I left my situation in Springfield, went home to my father’s house, and stayed there till I could give any proposition in the six books of Euclid at sight. I then found out what demonstrate means, and went back to my law studies.

February 13, 2009 - Posted by John Armstrong | Uncategorized | | 2 Comments

2 Comments »

  1. [...] couple of weeks ago, John Armstrong posted an interesting story about Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln carried three books with him when he traveled: [...]

    Pingback by Ars Mathematica » Blog Archive » Lincoln’s Elements | February 27, 2009 | Reply

  2. [...] 13 February 2009 — Charles Wells This is a good day to read John Armstrong’s post on Lincoln and proof. Posted in math, proof. Leave a Comment [...]

    Pingback by Lincoln and proof « Gyre&Gimble | September 8, 2009 | Reply


Leave a comment