Outer Lebesgue Measure and Content
Before I begin, I’d like to mention something in passing about Lebesgue measure. It’s pronounced “luh-bayg”. The “e” is a long “a”, the “s” is completely silent, and the “gue” is like in “analogue”. Moving on…
There is, as we might expect, a relationship between outer Lebesgue measure and Jordan content, some aspects of which we will flesh out now.
First off, if is a bounded subset of
-dimensional Euclidean space, then we have
. Indeed, if it’s bounded, then we can put it into a box
, and choose a partition
of this box. List out the
-dimensional intervals of
which contain points of
as
for
. Then by definition we have
Now given an , define the open
-dimensional intervals
. These form a Lebesgue covering
of
for which
Thus , and passing to the infimum we find
. Since
is arbitrary, we have
.
Secondly, if is bounded, and
is a compact subset, then
. Start by putting
into a box
, and take some
. We can find a Lebesgue covering
of
so that
, and this will also cover
. Since
is compact, we can pick out a finite collection
of open intervals which still manage to cover
. Finally, we can choose a partition
of
so that the corners of each interval in
are partition points. Given all of these choices, we find
And since is arbitrary we conclude
.
Finally, putting these two results together we can see that if is a compact set, then
.

Hey John. Sorry I haven’t commented for a while. I was wondering, what is the (or a?) Lebesgue measure?
Thanks in advancement and happy holidays,
NS
I haven’t defined it, and I don’t really intend to. I was pretty clear on this point when I started talking about Jordan content.
Oh I missed that part. Sorry about the trouble.
NS
sweet jesus, a blog where people talk abt math – recreationally?
Yes, and you know this already because I recognize your fake email address.
oh snaps!!!
lol,
NS
[...] , we also have , and therefore have as [...]
Pingback by Lebesgue’s Condition « The Unapologetic Mathematician | December 15, 2009 |
[...] measurable, because this will happen if and only if the boundary has zero Jordan content, and thus zero outer Lebesgue measure. Since the collection of new discontinuities must be contained in this boundary, it will also have [...]
Pingback by Integrals Over More General Sets « The Unapologetic Mathematician | December 22, 2009 |