Weyl Chambers
A very useful concept in our study of root systems will be that of a Weyl chamber. As we showed at the beginning of last time, the hyperplanes for
cannot fill up all of
. What’s left over they chop into a bunch of connected components, which we call Weyl chambers. Thus every regular vector
belongs to exactly one of these Weyl chambers, denoted
.
Saying that two vectors share a Weyl chamber — that — tells us that
and
lie on the same side of each and every hyperplane
for
. That is,
and
are either both positive or both negative. So this means that
, and thus the induced bases are equal:
. We see, then, that we have a natural bijection between the Weyl chambers of a root system
and the bases for
.
We write for
and call this the fundamental Weyl chamber relative to
. Geometrically,
is the open convex set consisting of the intersection of all the half-spaces
for
.
The Weyl group of
shuffles Weyl chambers around. Specifically, if
and
is regular, then
.
On the other hand, the Weyl group also sends bases of to each other. If
is a base, then
is another base. Indeed, since
is invertible
will still be a basis for
. Further, for any
we can write
, and then use the base property of
to write
as a nonnegative or nonpositive integral combination of
. Hitting everything with
makes
a nonnegative or nonpositive integral combination of
, and so this is indeed a base.
And, just as we’d hope, these two actions of the Weyl group are equivalent by the bijection above. We have because
preserves the inner product, and so
. Thus we write
for some regular
and find that

Neat!
[...] we’re ready to describe the action of the Weyl group of a root system on the set of its Weyl chambers. Specifically, the action is “simply transitive”, and the group itself is generated by [...]
Pingback by The Action of the Weyl Group on Weyl Chambers « The Unapologetic Mathematician | February 5, 2010 |
[...] Fundamental Weyl Chamber When we first discussed Weyl chambers, we defined the fundamental Weyl chamber associated to a base as the collection of all the [...]
Pingback by The Fundamental Weyl Chamber « The Unapologetic Mathematician | February 9, 2010 |