Continuity of Measures
Again we start with definitions. An extended real-valued set function on a collection of sets
is “continuous from below” at a set
if for every increasing sequence of sets
— that is, with each
— for which
— remember that this limit can be construed as the infinite union of the sets in the sequence — we have
. Similarly,
is “continuous from above” at
if for every decreasing sequence
for which
and which has
for at least one set in the sequence we have
. Of course, as usual we say that
is continuous from above (below) if it is continuous from above (below) at each set in its domain.
Now I say that a measure is continuous from above and below.
First, if is an increasing sequence whose limit is also in
, then
. Let’s define
and calculate
where we’ve used countable (and finite) additivity to turn the disjoint union into a sum and back.
Next, if is a decreasing sequence whose limit is also in
, and if at least one of the
has finite measure, then
. Indeed, if
has finite measure then
by monotonicity, and thus the limit must have finite measure as well. Now
is an increasing sequence, and we calculate
And thus a measure is continuous from above and from below.
On the other hand we have this partial converse: Let be a finite, non-negative, additive set function on an algebra
. Then if
either is continuous from below at every
or is continuous from above at
, then
is a measure. That is, either one of these continuity properties is enough to guarantee countable additivity.
Since is defined on an algebra, which is closed under finite unions, we can bootstrap from additivity to finite additivity. So let
be a countably infinite sequence of pairwise disjoint sets in
whose (disjoint) union
is also in
, and define the two sequences in
:
If is continuous from below,
is an increasing sequence converging to
. We find
On the other hand, if is continuous from above at
, then
is a decreasing sequence converging to
. We find
