The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

Lebesgue Measure

So we’ve identified a measure on the ring \mathcal{R} of finite disjoint unions of semiclosed intervals. Now we want to apply our extension and completion theorems.

The smallest \sigma-ring \mathcal{S} containing \mathcal{R} is also the smallest one containing the collection \mathcal{P} of semiclosed intervals. As it turns out, it’s also a \sigma-algebra. Indeed, we can write the whole real line \mathbb{R} as the countable disjoint union of elements of \mathcal{P}.


and so \mathbb{R} itself must be in \mathcal{S}. We call \mathcal{S} the \sigma-algebra of “Borel sets” of the real line.

Our measure \mu — defined on elements of \mathcal{P} by \mu(\left[b,a\right))=b-a — is not just \sigma-finite, but actually finite on \mathcal{R}. And thus its extension to \mathcal{S} will still be \sigma-finite. The above decomposition of \mathbb{R} into a countable collection of sets of finite \mu-measure shows us that the extended measure is, in fact, totally \sigma-finite.

But our measure might not be complete. As the smallest \sigma-algebra containing \mathcal{P}, \mathcal{S} might not contain all subsets of sets of \mu-measure zero. And thus we form the completions \overline{\mathcal{S}} of our \sigma-algebra and \bar{\mu} of our measure. We call \overline{\mathcal{S}} the \sigma-algebra of “Lebesgue measurable sets”, and \bar{\mu} is “Lebesgue measure” (remember, it’s pronounced “luh-BAYG”). In fact, the incomplete measure \mu on Borel sets is also often called Lebesgue measure.

About these ads

April 19, 2010 - Posted by | Analysis, Measure Theory


  1. […] Sets and Lebesgue Measure Let’s consider some of the easy properties of the Borel sets and Lebesgue measure we introduced […]

    Pingback by Borel Sets and Lebesgue Measure « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 20, 2010 | Reply

  2. […] thing that makes Lebesgue measure really special is the way that every part of the real line “looks like” every other […]

    Pingback by Lebesgue Measure and Affine Transformations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 22, 2010 | Reply

  3. […] Measurable Sets The attentive reader will note that in our study of Lebesgue measure we’ve defined it on some complete -algebra . In general, there’s no reason to believe […]

    Pingback by Lebesgue Measurable Sets « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 23, 2010 | Reply

  4. […] is a Borel set contained in . The difference set contains no point of , since if this happened we’d have […]

    Pingback by Non-Lebesgue Measurable Sets « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 24, 2010 | Reply

  5. […] For a while, we’ll mostly be interested in real-valued functions with Lebesgue measure on the real line, and ultimately in using measure to give us a new and more general version of […]

    Pingback by Measurable (Extended) Real-Valued Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 30, 2010 | Reply

  6. […] measurable functions on a measurable space would be to define a two-dimensional version of Borel sets and Lebesgue measure, and to tweak the definition of a measurable function to this space like we did before to treat […]

    Pingback by Adding and Multiplying Measurable Real-Valued Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 7, 2010 | Reply

  7. […] Upper and Lower Ordinate Sets Let be a measurable space so that itself is measurable — that is, so that is a -algebra — and let be the real line with the -algebra of Borel sets. […]

    Pingback by Upper and Lower Ordinate Sets « The Unapologetic Mathematician | July 20, 2010 | Reply

  8. […] upper and lower ordinate sets and to be measurable subsets of . Now if we have a measure on and Lebesgue measure on the Borel sets, we can define the product measure on . Since we know and are both measurable, […]

    Pingback by The Measures of Ordinate Sets « The Unapologetic Mathematician | July 26, 2010 | Reply

  9. […] Measure Algebra of the Unit Interval Let be the unit interval , let be the class of Borel sets on , and let be Lebesgue measure. If is a sequence of partitions of the maximal element of the […]

    Pingback by The Measure Algebra of the Unit Interval « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 25, 2010 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 392 other followers

%d bloggers like this: