## Measurable (Extended) Real-Valued Functions

For a while, we’ll mostly be interested in real-valued functions with Lebesgue measure on the real line, and ultimately in using measure to give us a new and more general version of integration. When we couple this with our slightly weakened definition of a measurable space, this necessitates a slight tweak to our definition of a measurable function.

Given a measurable space and a function , we define the set as the set of points such that . We will say that the real-valued function is measurable if is a measurable subset of for every Borel set of the real line. We have to treat specially because when we deal with integration, *is* special — it’s the additive identity of the real numbers.

The entire real line is a Borel set, and . Thus we find that must be a measurable subset of . If is another measurable subset of , then we observe

The second term on the right is either empty or is equal to . And so it’s clear that is measurable. We say that the function is “measurable on ” if is measurable for every Borel set , and so we have shown that a measurable function is measurable on every measurable set.

In particular, if is itself measurable (as it often is), then a real-valued function is measurable if and only if is measurable for every Borel set . And so in this (common) case, we get back our original definition of a measurable function .

The concept of measurability depends on the -ring , and we sometimes have more than one -ring floating around. In such a case, we say that a function is measurable with respect to . In particular, we will often be interested in the case , equipped with either the -algebra of Borel sets or that of Lebesgue measurable sets . A measurable function will be called “Borel measurable”, while a measurable function will be called “Lebesgue measurable”.

On the other hand, we should again emphasize that the definition of measurability does *not* depend on any particular measure .

We will also sometimes want to talk about measurable functions taking value in the extended reals. We take the convention that the one-point sets and are Borel sets; we add the requirement that a real-valued function also have and both be measurable to the condition for to be measurable. However, for this extended concept of Borel sets, we can no longer generate the class of Borel sets by semiclosed intervals.

[...] Measurable Real-Valued Functions We want a few more convenient definitions of a measurable real-valued function. To begin with: a real-valued function on a measurable space is measurable if and only if for [...]

Pingback by More Measurable Real-Valued Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 2, 2010 |

[...] Real-Valued Measurable Functions I Now that we’ve tweaked our definition of a measurable real-valued function, we may have broken composability. We [...]

Pingback by Composing Real-Valued Measurable Functions I « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 4, 2010 |

[...] sets and Lebesgue measure, and to tweak the definition of a measurable function to this space like we did before to treat the additive identity specially. Then we could set up products (which we will eventually [...]

Pingback by Adding and Multiplying Measurable Real-Valued Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 7, 2010 |

[...] of Measurable Functions We let be a sequence of extended real-valued measurable functions on a measurable space , and ask what we can say about limits of this [...]

Pingback by Sequences of Measurable Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 10, 2010 |

[...] We recall that we defined [...]

Pingback by Integrable Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 2, 2010 |

[...] one caveat is that we treated measurable real-valued functions differently from other ones. Just to be sure, let be a measurable real-valued function, and let be a Borel [...]

Pingback by Sections of Sets and Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | July 19, 2010 |