# The Unapologetic Mathematician

## Properties of Integrable Functions

Now we’ve got a definition of the integral of a wider variety of functions than before, so let’s look over the basic properties.

First of all, from what we know about convergence in measure and algebraic and order properties of integrals of simple functions, we can see that if $f$ and $g$ are integrable functions and $\alpha$ is a real number, then so are the absolute value $\lvert f\rvert$, the scalar multiple $\alpha f$, and the sum $f+g$. As special cases, we can see that the positive and negative parts

\displaystyle\begin{aligned}f^+&=\frac{1}{2}(\lvert f\rvert+f)\\f^-&=\frac{1}{2}(\lvert f\rvert-f)\end{aligned}

are both integrable.

If $E$ is a measurable set and $\{f_n\}$ is a mean Cauchy sequence of integrable simple functions converging in measure to $f$, then it should be clear that $\{f\chi_E\}$ is mean Cauchy and converges in measure to $f\chi_E$. Thus we can define

$\displaystyle\int\limits_Ef\,d\mu=\int f\chi_E\,d\mu$

Since integrals of simple functions are linear, and limits are linear, we immediately conclude that

$\displaystyle\int\alpha f+\beta g\,d\mu=\alpha\int f\,d\mu+\beta\int g\,d\mu$

as before, but now for general integrable functions. Similarly, if $f$ is nonnegative a.e., we can find a sequence of nonnegative simple functions converging a.e. (and thus in measure) to $f$. The integral of each of these functions is nonnegative, and so their limit must be as well. That is, if $f\geq0$ a.e., then

$\displaystyle\int f\,d\mu\geq0$

Now, all our properties that we proved using only these two linearity and order properties follow. If $f\geq g$ a.e., then

$\displaystyle\int f\,d\mu\geq\int g\,d\mu$

For any two integrable functions $f$ amd $g$ we find

$\displaystyle\int\lvert f+g\rvert\,d\mu\leq\int\lvert f\rvert\,d\mu+\int\lvert g\rvert\,d\mu$

and

$\displaystyle\left\lvert\int f\,d\mu\right\rvert\leq\int\lvert f\rvert\,d\mu$

If $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are real numbers so that $\alpha\leq f(x)\leq\beta$ for almost all $x\in E$, then we have

$\displaystyle\alpha\mu(E)\leq\int\limits_Ef\,d\mu\leq\beta\mu(E)$

and if an integrable function $f$ is a.e. nonnegative, then its indefinite integral is monotone.

It takes a bit of work, though, to check that the indefinite integral $\nu$ of an integrable function $f$ is absolutely continuous. If $\{f_n\}$ is a mean Cauchy sequence converging in measure to $f$, then we have

$\displaystyle\left\lvert\int\limits_Ef\,d\mu\right\rvert\leq\left\lvert\int\limits_Ef_n\,d\mu\right\rvert+\left\lvert\int\limits_Ef\,d\mu-\int\limits_Ef_n\,d\mu\right\rvert$

We know that the indefinite integrals $\nu_n$ of the $f_n$ are uniformly absolutely continuous, so we have control over the size of the first term on the right. The second term on the right can be kept small by choosing a large enough $n$, since $\{f_n\}$ converges in measure to $f$.

Finally, the indefinite integral $\nu$ of $f$ is countably additive; since $\{f_n\}$ is a mean Cauchy sequence of simple functions we can write $\nu$ as the limit $\nu(E)=\lim_n\nu_n(E)$, and we know that this limit is countably additive.

About these ads

June 3, 2010 - Posted by | Analysis, Measure Theory

## 3 Comments »

1. […] got our general definition of integrable functions, and we’ve reestablished a bunch of our basic properties in this setting. Let’s consider some properties that involve the […]

Pingback by Mean Convergence Properties of Integrals « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 4, 2010 | Reply

2. […] an so that for we have . The indefinite integral of a nonnegative a.e. function is real-valued, countably additive, and nonnegative, and thus is a measure. Thus, like any measure, it’s continuous from above at . And so for […]

Pingback by Equicontinuity, Convergence in Measure, and Convergence in Mean « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 9, 2010 | Reply

3. […] is clearly real-valued, and we’ve seen that it’s countably additive. If is a.e. non-negative, then will also be non-negative, and […]

Pingback by Extending the Integral « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 21, 2010 | Reply