## Modules

With the group algebra in hand, we now define a “-module” to be a module for the group algebra of . That is, it’s a (finite-dimensional) vector space and a bilinear map . This map must satisfy and .

This is really the same thing as a representation, since we may as well pick a basis for and write . Then for any we can write

That is, is a linear map from to itself, with its matrix entries given by . We define this matrix to be , which must be a representation because of the conditions on above.

Conversely, if we have a matrix representation , we can define a module map for as

where we apply the matrix to the column vector . This must satisfy the above conditions, since they reflect the fact that is a representation.

In fact, to define , all we really need to do is to define it for the basis elements . Then linearity will take care of the rest of the group algebra. That is, we can just as well say that a -module is a vector space and a function satisfying the following three conditions:

- is linear in : .
- preserves the identity: .
- preserves the group operation: .

The difference between the representation viewpoint and the -module viewpoint is that representations emphasize the group elements and their actions, while -modules emphasize the representing space . This viewpoint will be extremely helpful when we want to consider a representation as a *thing* in and of itself. It’s easier to do this when we think of it as a vector space equipped with the extra structure of a -action.

For whatever reason, I took a course in Module Theory at Caltech, got lost in the forest, and couldn’t remember by the end what I was learning this FOR. Thanks for being so clear. Maybe I’ll get it better this time around…

Comment by Jonathan Vos Post | September 15, 2010 |

[...] Actions and Representations From the module perspective, we’re led back to the concept of a group action. This is like a -module, but [...]

Pingback by Group Actions and Representations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 16, 2010 |

[...] course, this shouldn’t really surprise us. After all, representations of are equivalent to modules for the group algebra; and the very fact that is an algebra means that it comes with a bilinear [...]

Pingback by The (Left) Regular Representation « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 17, 2010 |

[...] Between Representations Since every representation of is a -module, we have an obvious notion of a morphism between them. But let’s be explicit about [...]

Pingback by Morphisms Between Representations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 21, 2010 |

[...] We say that a module is “reducible” if it contains a nontrivial submodule. Thus our examples last time show [...]

Pingback by Reducibility « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 23, 2010 |

[...] I’d like to cover a stronger condition than reducibility: decomposability. We say that a module is “decomposable” if we can write it as the direct sum of two nontrivial submodules [...]

Pingback by Decomposability « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 24, 2010 |

[...] and Kernels A nice quick one today. Let’s take two -modules and . We’ll write for the vector space of intertwinors from to . This is pretty [...]

Pingback by Images and Kernels « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 29, 2010 |

[...] Now that we know that images and kernels of -morphisms between -modules are -modules as well, we can bring in a very general [...]

Pingback by Schur’s Lemma « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 30, 2010 |

[...] and Commutant Algebras We will find it useful in our study of -modules to study not only the morphisms between them, but the structures that they [...]

Pingback by Endomorphism and Commutant Algebras « The Unapologetic Mathematician | October 1, 2010 |

[...] way of looking at it: remember that a representation of a group on a space can be regarded as a module for the group algebra . If we then add a commuting representation of a group , we can actually [...]

Pingback by Representing Product Groups « The Unapologetic Mathematician | November 1, 2010 |

[...] that we’re interested in concrete actions of Lie algebras on vector spaces, like we were for groups. Given a Lie algebra we define an -module to be a vector space equipped with a bilinear function [...]

Pingback by Lie Algebra Modules « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 12, 2012 |