The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

The Character Table of a Group

Given a group G, Maschke’s theorem tells us that every G-module is completely reducible. That is, we can write any such module V as the direct sum of irreducible representations:

\displaystyle V=\bigoplus\limits_{i=1}^km_iV^{(i)}

Thus the irreducible representations are the most important ones to understand. And so we’re particularly interested in their characters, which we call “irreducible characters”.

Of course an irreducible character — like all characters — is a class function. We can describe it by giving its values on each conjugacy class. And so we lay out the “character table”. This is an array whose rows are indexed by inequivalent irreducible representations, and whose columns are indexed by conjugacy classes K\subseteq G. The row indexed by V^{(i)} describes the corresponding irreducible character \chi^{(i)}. If k\in K is a representative of the conjugacy class, then the entry in the column indexed by K is \chi^{(i)}_K=\chi^{(i)}(k). That is, the character table looks like

\displaystyle\begin{array}{c|ccc}&\cdots&K&\cdots\\\hline\vdots&&\vdots&\\V^{(i)}&\cdots&\chi^{(i)}_K&\cdots\\\vdots&&\vdots&\end{array}

By convention, the first row corresponds to the trivial representation, and the first column corresponds to the conjugacy class \{e\} of the identity element. We know that the trivial representation sends every group element to the 1\times 1 identity matrix, whose trace is 1. We also know that every character’s value on the identity element is the degree of the corresponding representation. We can slightly refine our first picture to sketch the character table like so:

\displaystyle\begin{array}{c|cccc}&\{e\}&\cdots&K&\cdots\\\hline V^\mathrm{triv}&1&\cdots&1&\cdots\\\vdots&\vdots&&\vdots&\\V^{(i)}&\deg\left(V^{(i)}\right)&\cdots&\chi^{(i)}_K&\cdots\\\vdots&\vdots&&\vdots&\end{array}

We have no reason to believe (yet) that the table is finite. Since G is a finite group there can be only finitely many conjugacy classes, and thus only finitely many columns, but as far as we can tell there may be infinitely many inequivalent irreps, and thus infinitely many rows. Further, we have no reason to believe that the rows are all distinct. Indeed, we know that equivalent representations have equal characters — they’re related through conjugation by an invertible intertwinor — but we don’t know for sure that inequivalent representations must have distinct characters.

As an example, we can start writing down the character table of S_3. We know that conjugacy classes in symmetric groups correspond to cycle types, and so we can write down all three conjugacy classes easily:

\displaystyle\begin{aligned}K_1&=\left\{e\right\}\\K_2&=\left\{(1\,2),(1\,3),(2\,3)\right\}\\K_3&=\left\{(1\,2\,3),(1\,3\,2)\right\}\end{aligned}

We know of two irreps offhand — the trivial representation and the signum representation — and so we’ll start with those and leave the table incomplete below that:

\displaystyle\begin{array}{c|ccc}&K_1&K_2&K_3\\\hline V^\mathrm{triv}&1&1&1\\V^\mathrm{sgn}&1&-1&1\\\vdots&\vdots&\vdots&\vdots\end{array}

October 20, 2010 Posted by | Algebra, Group theory, Representation Theory | 5 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 391 other followers