The Submodule Theorem
Sorry for the delay.
Let be a submodule of one of the Young tabloid modules. Then I say that either
contains the Specht module
, or it is contained in the orthogonal complement
. In particular, each Specht module
is irreducible, since any nontrivial submodule
cannot be contained in the orthogonal complement, and so it must also contain — and thus be equal to —
.
To see this, let be any vector, and let
be a
-tableau. Our last result showed us that
for some
. First, we’ll assume that there is some pair of
and
so that
. In this case,
. Since
generates all of
— the Specht modules are cyclic — we must have
.
On the other hand, what if there is no such pair of and
? That is,
for all vectors
and
-tableaux
. We can calculate
So each vector is orthogonal to each polytabloid
. Since the polytabloids span
, we must have
.

[...] of the Submodule Theorem We have a number of immediate consequences of the submodule theorem. First, and most important, the Specht modules form a complete list of irreducible modules for the [...]
Pingback by Consequences of the Submodule Theorem « The Unapologetic Mathematician | January 4, 2011 |