Standard Polytabloids are Independent
Now we’re all set to show that the polytabloids that come from standard tableaux are linearly independent. This is half of showing that they form a basis of our Specht modules. We’ll actually use a lemma that applies to any vector space with an ordered basis
. Here
indexes some set
of basis vectors which has some partial order
.
So, let be vectors in
, and suppose that for each
we can pick some basis vector
which shows up with a nonzero coefficient in
subject to the following two conditions. First, for each
the basis element
should be the maximum of all the basis vectors having nonzero coefficients in
. Second, the
are all distinct.
We should note that the first of these conditions actually places some restrictions on what vectors the can be in the first place. For each one, the collection of basis vectors with nonzero coefficients must have a maximum. That is, there must be some basis vector in the collection which is actually bigger (according to the partial order
) than all the others in the collection. It’s not sufficient for
to be maximal, which only means that there is no larger index in the collection. The difference is similar to that between local maxima and a global maximum for a real-valued function.
This distinction should be kept in mind, since now we’re going to shuffle the order of the so that
is maximal among the basis elements
. That is, none of the other
should be bigger than
, although some may be incomparable with it. Now I say that
cannot have a nonzero coefficient in any other of the
. Indeed, if it had a nonzero coefficient in, say,
, then by assumption we would have
, which contradicts the maximality of
. Thus in any linear combination
we must have , since there is no other way to cancel off all the occurrences of
. Removing
from the collection, we can repeat the reasoning with the remaining vectors until we get down to a single one, which is trivially independent.
So in the case we care about the space is the Young tabloid module , with the basis of Young tabloids having the dominance ordering. In particular, we consider for our
the collection of polytabloids
where
is a standard tableau. In this case, we know that
is the maximum of all the tabloids showing up as summands in
. And these standard tabloids are all distinct, since they arise from distinct standard tableaux. Thus our lemma shows that not only are the standard polytabloids
distinct, they are actually linearly independent vectors in
.
The Maximality of Standard Tableaux
Standard tableaux have a certain maximality property with respect to the dominance order on tabloids. Specifically, if is standard and
appears as a summand in the polytabloid
, then
.
Any such comes from
, where
. We will make our induction on the number of “column inversions” in
. That is, the number of pairs of entries
that are in the same column of
, but which are “out of order”, in the sense that
is in a lower row than
.
Given any such pair, the dominance lemma tells us that . That is, by “untwisting” the column inversion, we can move up the dominance order while preserving the columns. It should also be clear that
has fewer column inversions than
does. But if we undo all the column inversions, the tableau we’re left with must be standard. That is, it must be
itself.
