The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

The Direct Image Functor

So far our morphisms only let us compare presheaves and sheaves on a single topological space X. In fact, we have a category \mathrm{Sh}(X) of sheaves (of sets, by default) on X. But there are also constructions that involve more than one space. The direct image functor is a way of pushing forward a sheaf structure along a continuous map. It’s relatively simple and we may find it useful, so let’s just get it out of the way now.

So, let’s say we have two topological spaces X and Y, and a continuous function f:X\to Y. I say that if \mathcal{F}\in\mathrm{Sh}(X) is a sheaf on X, then we can define a “direct image” sheaf f_*\mathcal{F} on Y in a natural way. Indeed, given an open set V\subseteq Y, we know that its preimage f^{-1}(V)\subseteq X is an open subset of X. And so it only makes sense to define f_*\mathcal{F}(V)=\mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(V)).

Now you might be thinking, “wait, if the canonical example of a sheaf is a sheaf of functions, shouldn’t we be pulling back?” And this does make a certain amount of sense: given a function on all of Y we can define a function on all of X by composing it with f, so it seems that “functions pull back” naturally. It would seem to make sense for us to take a function g defined on an open subset V\subseteq Y, compose it with f, and put the resulting g\circ f into the set corresponding to f^{-1}(V).

But while this defines sets for all these preimages, not all preimages are of this form! Indeed, we have no idea how to define the elements of an “inverse image” sheaf over a set U where f(U) is not itself open, and there is no guarantee at all that it will be. There is a way to remedy this problem, using a method called “sheafification”, but that’s a more involved subject I’d rather not dig into quite yet.

March 21, 2011 Posted by | Topology | 2 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 391 other followers