The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

Coordinate Vectors Span Tangent Spaces

Given a point p in an n-dimensional manifold M, we have the vector space \mathcal{T}_pM of tangent vectors at p. Given a coordinate patch (U,x) around p, we’ve constructed n coordinate vectors at p, and shown that they’re linearly independent in \mathcal{T}_pM. I say that they also span the space, and thus constitute a basis.

To see this, we’ll need a couple lemmas. First off, if f is constant in a neighborhood of p, then v(f)=0 for any tangent vector v. Indeed, since all that matters is the germ of f, we may as well assume that f is the constant function with value c. By linearity we know that v(c)=cv(1). But now since 1=1\cdot1 we use the derivation property to find

\displaystyle v(1)=v(1\cdot1)=v(1)1(p)+1(p)v(1)=2v(1)

and so we conclude that v(1)=v(c)=0.

In a slightly more technical vein, let U be a “star-shaped” neighborhood of 0\in\mathbb{R}^n. That is, not only does U contain 0 itself, but for every point x\in U it contains the whole segment of points tx for 0\leq t\leq1. An open ball, for example, is star-shaped, so you can just think of that to be a little simpler.

Anyway, given such a U and a differentiable function f on it we can find n functions \psi_i with \psi_i(0)=D_if(0), and such that we can write

\displaystyle f=f(0)+\sum\limits_{i=1}^nu^i\psi_i

where u^i is the ith component function.

If we pick a point x\in U we can parameterize the segment c(t)=tx, and set \phi=f\circ c to get a function on the unit interval \phi:[0,1]\to\mathbb{R}. This function is clearly differentiable, and we can calculate

\displaystyle\phi'(t)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^n\frac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}\frac{dc^i}{dt}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^nD_if(tx)x^i

using the multivariable chain rule. We find

\displaystyle\begin{aligned}f(x)-f(0)&=\phi(1)-\phi(0)\\&=\int\limits_0^1\phi'(t)\,dt\\&=\sum\limits_{i=1}^nx^i\int\limits_0^1D_if(tx)\,dt\end{aligned}

We can thus find the desired functions \psi_i by setting

\displaystyle\psi_i(x)=\int\limits_0^1D_if(tx)\,dt

Now if we have a differentiable function f defined on a neighborhood U of a point p\in M, we can find a coordinate patch (U,x) — possibly by shrinking U — with x(p)=0 and x(U) star-shaped. Then we can apply the previous lemma to f\circ x^{-1} to get

\displaystyle f\circ x^{-1}=f(p)+\sum\limits_{i=1}^nu^i\psi_i

with \psi_i(0)=\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}(p)\right](f). Moving the coordinate map to the other side we find

\displaystyle f=f(p)+\sum\limits_{i=1}^nx^i\left(\psi_i\circ x\right)

Now we can hit this with a tangent vector v

\displaystyle\begin{aligned}v(f)&=v\left(f(p)+\sum\limits_{i=1}^nx^i\left(\psi_i\circ x\right)\right)\\&=v\left(f(p)\right)+\sum\limits_{i=1}^nv\left(x^i\left(\psi_i\circ x\right)\right)\\&=\sum\limits_{i=1}^n\left(v(x^i)\left[\psi_i\circ x\right](p)+x^i(p)v\left(\psi_i\circ x\right)\right)\\&=\sum\limits_{i=1}^nv(x^i)\psi_i(0)\\&=\sum\limits_{i=1}^nv(x^i)\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}(p)\right](f)\end{aligned}

where we have used linearity, the derivation property, and the first lemma above. Thus we can write

\displaystyle v=\sum\limits_{i=1}^nv(x^i)\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}(p)

and the coordinate vectors span the space of tangent vectors at p.

As a consequence, we conclude that \mathcal{T}_pM always has dimension n — exactly the same dimension as the manifold itself. And this is exactly what we should expect; if M is n-dimensional, then in some sense there are n independent directions to move in near any point p, and these “directions to move” are the core of our geometric notion of a tangent vector. Ironically, if we start from a more geometric definition of tangent vectors, it’s actually somewhat harder to establish this fact, which is partly why we’re starting with the more algebraic definition.

Advertisement

March 31, 2011 - Posted by | Differential Topology, Topology

6 Comments »

  1. [...] problem, then, is to calculate the th component — the one corresponding to — of . But we know that this coefficient comes from sticking into this vector and seeing what pops [...]

    Pingback by Derivatives in Coordinates « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 6, 2011 | Reply

  2. [...] basis on , and thus get components of in those coordinates. As usual, we calculate the th component [...]

    Pingback by Curves « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 8, 2011 | Reply

  3. [...] if has dimension , then we know is an -manifold, and thus we know that is an -dimensional vector space for every point . Now, of course all -dimensional vector [...]

    Pingback by The Tangent Bundle of a Euclidean Space « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 11, 2011 | Reply

  4. [...] we know at each point that the coordinate vectors span the tangent space. So let’s take a vector field and break up the vector . We can [...]

    Pingback by Coordinate Vector Fields « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 24, 2011 | Reply

  5. [...] is basically just like a lemma we proved for functions on star-shaped neighborhoods. Indeed, it suffices to [...]

    Pingback by Calculating the Lie Derivative « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 16, 2011 | Reply

  6. Just after “multivariable chain rule”, f(p) – f(0) should be f(x) – f(0).

    p lives in the manifold rather than R^n.

    Comment by Rory Molinari | July 6, 2011 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 627 other followers