The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider


Now we can start coming back down to geometric earth. A smooth curve in a smooth manifold M is nothing but a smooth map c:I\to M, where I is some interval in the real line with its standard differentiable structure. The interval I can, in principle, be half-infinite or infinite, but commonly we just consider finite open intervals like (0,1).

At any point t_0 of an open interval, the tangent space \mathcal{T}_{t_0}I is one-dimensional. And, in fact, it comes equipped with a canonical vector to use as a basis: \frac{d}{dt}(t_0), the derivative operator at the point itself! Any other linear functions on germs at t_0 that satisfies a product rule must be a scalar multiple of this one.

Since we have a canonical tangent vector in \mathcal{T}_{t_0}I, we can hit it with the derivative c_{*t_0} and see what happens. We get a tangent vector

\displaystyle c_{*t_0}\left(\frac{d}{dt}(t_0)\right)\in\mathcal{T}_{c(t_0)}M

which we call the tangent vector of c at t_0, and we write it as c'(t_0).

Let’s say that c(t_0)=p\in M and let f be a germ at p. What does c'(t_0) do to f? We can calculate:

\displaystyle\begin{aligned}\left[c'(t_0)\right](f)&=\left[c_{*t_0}\left(\frac{d}{dt}(t_0)\right)\right](f)\\&=\left[\left(\frac{d}{dt}(t_0)\right)\right](f\circ c)\\&=\frac{d}{dt}\left(f\circ c\right)\bigg\vert_{t_0}\end{aligned}

That is, we pull the function f back along c to define a smooth real-valued function on the interval I itself, then we hit it with the derivative operator and evaluate at t_0.

If our curve lies with a coordinate patch (U,x) — or if we cut out a segment of the curve that does — then we have a curve x\circ c:I\to\mathbb{R}^n. We can also use x to define a coordinate basis on \mathcal{T}_pM, and thus get components of c'(t_0) in those coordinates. As usual, we calculate the ith component by

\displaystyle\begin{aligned}\left[c'(t_0)\right](x^i)&=\frac{d}{dt}\left(x^i\circ c\right)\bigg\vert_{t_0}\\&=\frac{d}{dt}\left(u^i\circ(x\circ c)\right)\bigg\vert_{t_0}\end{aligned}

But this is just the derivative of the ith component of the function x\circ c. That is, when we’re working in local coordinates we get ith coefficient of the tangent vector c'(t_0) by taking the derivative of the ith component function of the curve.

If you remember calculations like this in multivariable calculus, this is almost exactly why it works. There’s one other little caveat, though, that we’ll get to next time.

About these ads

April 8, 2011 - Posted by | Differential Topology, Topology


  1. [...] of all, let’s set up an isomorphism between and . Given a vector , we can set up the curve . Then we just define a vector in by picking the tangent vector to at . This correspondence is [...]

    Pingback by The Tangent Bundle of a Euclidean Space « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 11, 2011 | Reply

  2. [...] of tangent vectors back into geometry. Let be a manifold containing a point . Now consider a smooth curve in that passes through this point. Without loss of generality, we can let , and let . This will [...]

    Pingback by Tangent Vectors Geometrically « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 12, 2011 | Reply

  3. [...] this is exactly how we defined the derivative of a curve! That is, we can write down a function which satisfies for every . We call such a curve an [...]

    Pingback by Integral Curves and Local Flows « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 28, 2011 | Reply

  4. [...] singular -cube in is a differentiable map from the standard -cube to the manifold. For example, a curve is a singular -cube. We also consider , so a singular -cube in just picks out a single point of [...]

    Pingback by Integration on Singular Cubes « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 3, 2011 | Reply

  5. [...] an oriented curve in the manifold . We know that this is a singular -cube, and so we can pair it off with a -form . [...]

    Pingback by Line Integrals « The Unapologetic Mathematician | October 21, 2011 | Reply

  6. [...] we take an oriented curve in a manifold . The image of is an oriented submanifold of , where the “orientation” [...]

    Pingback by The Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals « The Unapologetic Mathematician | October 24, 2011 | Reply

  7. [...] say that a space is “simply-connected” if any closed curve with is homotopic to a constant curve that stays at the single point . Intuitively, this means [...]

    Pingback by Simply-Connected Spaces « The Unapologetic Mathematician | December 14, 2011 | Reply

  8. [...] example, let’s say we have a curve , and along this curve we have a charge. It makes sense to measure the charge in units per unit of [...]

    Pingback by Charge Distibutions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | January 6, 2012 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 366 other followers

%d bloggers like this: