The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

Submanifolds

At last we can actually define submanifolds. If M and N are both manifolds with M\subseteq N as topological spaces — the points of M form a subset of the points of N and the topology of M agrees with the subspace topology from N — then we say that M is a submanifold of N if the inclusion map \iota:M\to N is an embedding. If the inclusion is only an immersion, we say that M is an “immersed submanifold” of N.

Now, if f:M\to N is any embedding of one manifold into another, then the image f(M)\subseteq N is a submanifold, as defined above. Similarly, the image of an injective immersion is an immersed submanifold. The tricky bit here is that if we have a situation like the second of our pathological immersions, we have to consider the topology on the image that does not consider the endpoints to be “close” to the middle point on the curve that they approach.

This motivates us to define an equivalence relation on injective immersions into N: if f_1:M_1\to N and f_2:M_2\to N are two maps, we consider them equivalent if there is a diffeomorphism g:M_1\to M_2 so that f_1=f_2\circ g. Clearly, this is reflexive (we just let g be the identity map), symmetric (a diffeomorphism g is invertible), and transitive (the composition of two diffeomorphisms is another one).

The nice thing about this equivalence class is that every immersion is equivalent to a unique immersed submanifold, and so there is no real loss in speaking about an immersion f:M\to N as “being” an immersed submanifold. And of course the same goes for embeddings “being” submanifolds as well.

About these ads

April 20, 2011 - Posted by | Differential Topology, Topology

4 Comments »

  1. [...] regular value of , then is a topological manifold of dimension . Or, to put it another way, is a submanifold of “codimension” . Further, there is a unique differentiable structure for which is a [...]

    Pingback by Regular and Critical Points « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 21, 2011 | Reply

  2. [...] how this dovetails with our discussion of submanifolds. The projection is a smooth map, and every point is a regular value. Its preimage is a [...]

    Pingback by The Tangent Space of a Product « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 27, 2011 | Reply

  3. [...] of an -dimensional manifold is a partition of into -dimensional connected immersed submanifolds, which are called the “leaves” of the foliation. We also ask that the tangent spaces to [...]

    Pingback by Foliations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | July 1, 2011 | Reply

  4. [...] one shape into another. In this case, when we say “shape” we really mean a subspace or submanifold of some outside space we occupy, like the three-dimensional space that contains our idiomatic [...]

    Pingback by Homotopy « The Unapologetic Mathematician | November 29, 2011 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 391 other followers

%d bloggers like this: