## Maps Intertwining Vector Fields

Let be a smooth map between manifolds, with derivative , and let and be smooth vector fields. We can compose them as and , and it makes sense to ask if these are the same map.

To put it another way, is the vector specifies for the point . On the other hand, is the image of the vector specifies for the point . If these two vectors are the same for every , then we say that “intertwines” the two vector fields, or that and are “-related”. The latter term is a bit awkward, which is why I prefer the former, especially since it does have that same commutative-diagram feel as intertwinors between representations.

Anyway, in the case that is a diffeomorphism we can actually use this to transfer vector fields from one manifold to the other. Given a point , which point should it be compared to? the inverse image , of course. This point gets the vector , which then gets sent to . That is, if we define , then is guaranteed to intertwine and .

Since is a linear map on each stalk it’s clear that if intertwines and , as well as and , then intertwines and . But we’ve just seen that vector fields form a Lie algebra, and it would be nice if we could say the same for and . The catch is that we don’t just compute these point-by-point.

Let’s pick a text function and a point . We first check that

Now we can calculate

So intertwines and , as we asserted. In the case where is a diffeomorphism, this means that the construction above gives us a homomorphism of Lie algebras from to .

[...] vector fields on . A vector field is left-invariant if the diffeomorphism of left-translation intertwines with itself for all . That is, must satisfy ; or to put it another way: . This is a very strong [...]

Pingback by The Lie Algebra of a Lie Group « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 8, 2011 |

[...] than this if is a diffeomorphism we say that a vector field is “-invariant” if it is -related to itself. That is, a vector field on a Lie group is left-invariant if it is -invariant for all [...]

Pingback by Invariance and Flows « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 17, 2011 |

[...] describe the th coordinate vector field by saying it’s the unique vector field on that is -related to the th partial derivative in . That is, we’re trying to prove that: on [...]

Pingback by Building Charts from Vector Fields « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 22, 2011 |

[...] that are -related to and , respectively. That is, for all , and similarly for and . But then we know that , and so [...]

Pingback by Integral Submanifolds « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 30, 2011 |

[...] the position vector field is -related to itself; if is used as the first vector in a positively-oriented basis of , then is the first [...]

Pingback by The “Hairy Ball Theorem” « The Unapologetic Mathematician | December 13, 2011 |