Integral Submanifolds
Given a -dimensional distribution
on an
-dimensional manifold
, we say that a
-dimensional submanifold
is an “integral submanifold” of
if
for every
. That is, if the subspace of
spanned by the images of vectors from
is exactly
.
This is a lot like an integral curve, with one slight distinction: in the case on an integral curve we also demand that the length of match that of
, not just the direction (up to sign).
Now, if for every there exists an integral submanifold
of
with
, then
is integrable. Indeed, let
and
belong to
. Since
is an isomorphism of vector spaces at every point, we can find
and
that are
-related to
and
, respectively. That is,
for all
, and similarly for
and
. But then we know that
, and so
.
Advertisement

[...] around such that on . Then the curve with coordinates and for all other is a one-dimensional integral submanifold of through [...]
Pingback by Integrable Distributions Have Integral Submanifolds « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 30, 2011 |
[...] a -dimensional distribution on , which we say is “induced” by , and that any connected integral submanifold of should be contained in a leaf of . It makes sense, then, that we should call a leaf of a [...]
Pingback by Foliations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | July 1, 2011 |