Integrals over Manifolds (part 2)
Okay, so we can now integrate forms as long as they’re supported within the image of an orientation-preserving singular cube. But what if the form is bigger than that?
Well, paradoxically, we start by getting smaller. Specifically, I say that we can always find an orientable open cover of such that each set in the cover is contained within the image of a singular cube.
We start with any orientable atlas, which gives us a coordinate patch around any point
we choose. Without loss of generality we can pick the coordinates such that
. There must be some open ball around
whose closure is completely contained within
; this closure is itself the image of a singular cube, and the ball obviously contained in its closure. Hitting everything with
we get an open set — the inverse image of the ball — contained in the image of a singular cube, all of which contains
. Since we can find such a set around any point
we can throw them together to get an open cover of
.
So, what does this buy us? If is any compactly-supported
form on an
-dimensional manifold
, we can cover its support with some open subsets of
, each of which is contained in the image of a singular
-cube. In fact, since the support is compact, we only need a finite number of the open sets to do the job, and throw in however many others we need to cover the rest of
.
We can then find a partition of unity subordinate to this cover of
. We can decompose
into a (finite) sum:
which is great because now we can define
But now we must be careful! What if this definition depends on our choice of a suitable partition of unity? Well, say that is another such partition. Then we can write
so we get the same answer no matter which partition we use.

[...] Without loss of generality, we may assume that is supported within the image of a singular cube . If not, we break it apart with a partition of unity as usual. [...]
Pingback by Switching Orientations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 8, 2011 |
[...] we can assume that the support of fits within some singular cube , for if it doesn’t we can chop it up into pieces that do fit into cubes , and similarly chop up into pieces that fit within [...]
Pingback by Integrals and Diffeomorphisms « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 12, 2011 |
[...] is such a manifold of dimension , and if is a compactly-supported -form, then as usual we can use a partition of unity to break up the form into pieces, each of which is supported within [...]
Pingback by Stokes’ Theorem on Manifolds « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 16, 2011 |
[...] many such singular cubes, and the integral on each is well-defined. Using a partition of unity as usual this shows us that the integral over all of exists and, further, must be strictly positive. In [...]
Pingback by Compact Oriented Manifolds without Boundary have Nontrivial Homology « The Unapologetic Mathematician | November 24, 2011 |