Integrals and Diffeomorphisms
Let’s say we have a diffeomorphism from one
-dimensional manifold to another. Since
is both smooth and has a smooth inverse, we must find that the Jacobian is always invertible; the inverse of
at
is
at
. And so — assuming
is connected — the sign of the determinant must be constant. That is,
is either orientation preserving or orientation-reversing.
Remembering that diffeomorphism is meant to be our idea of what it means for two smooth manifolds to be “equivalent”, this means that is either equivalent to
or to
. And I say that this equivalence comes out in integrals.
So further, let’s say we have a compactly-supported -form
on
. We can use
to pull back
from
to
. Then I say that
where the positive sign holds if is orientation-preserving and the negative if
is orientation-reversing.
In fact, we just have to show the orientation-preserving side, since if is orientation-reversing from
to
then it’s orientation-preserving from
to
, and we already know that integrals over
are the negatives of those over
. Further, we can assume that the support of
fits within some singular cube
, for if it doesn’t we can chop it up into pieces that do fit into cubes
, and similarly chop up
into pieces that fit within corresponding singular cubes
.
But now it’s easy! If is supported within the image of an orientation-preserving singular cube
, then
must be supported within
, which is also orientation-preserving since both
and
are, by assumption. Then we find
In this sense we say that integrals are preserved by (orientation-preserving) diffeomorphisms.
