## The Faraday Field

Now that we’ve seen that we can use the speed of light as a conversion factor to put time and space measurements on an equal footing, let’s actually do it to Maxwell’s equations. We start by moving the time derivatives over on the same side as all the space derivatives:

The exterior derivatives here written as comprise the derivatives in all the spatial directions. If we pick coordinates , , and , then we can write the third equation as three component equations that each look something like

This doesn’t look right at all! We’ve got a partial derivative with respect to floating around, but I see no corresponding . So if we’re going to move to a four-dimensional spacetime and still use exterior derivatives, we can pick up terms from the time derivative of . But for the others to cancel off, they already need to have a around in the first place. That is, we don’t actually have an electric -form:

In truth we have an electric -form:

Now, what does this mean for the exterior derivative ?

Nothing has really changed, except now there’s an extra factor of at the end of everything.

What happens to the exterior derivative of now that we’re using as another coordinate? Well, in components we write:

and thus we calculate:

Now the first part of this is just the old, three-dimensional exterior derivative of , corresponding to the divergence. The second of Maxwell’s equations says that it’s zero. And the other part of this is the time derivative of , but with an extra factor of .

So let’s take the -form and the -form and put them together:

The first term vanishes because of the second of Maxwell’s equations, and the rest all vanish because they’re the components of the third of Maxwell’s equations. That is, the second and third of Maxwell’s equations are both subsumed in this one four-dimensional equation.

When we rewrite the electric and magnetic fields as -forms like this, their sum is called the “Faraday field” . The second and third of Maxwell’s equations are equivalent to the single assertion that .

[...] we push ahead with the Faraday field in hand, we need to properly define the Hodge star in our four-dimensional space, and we need a [...]

Pingback by Minkowski Space « The Unapologetic Mathematician | March 7, 2012 |

that’s help me, thank for your faraday explanation

Comment by arif | April 3, 2012 |

[...] a vacuum we just have the electromagnetic fields and no charge or current distribution. We use the Faraday field to write down the [...]

Pingback by The Higgs Mechanism part 2: Examples of Lagrangian Field Equations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | July 17, 2012 |

[...] — if we expand out as if it’s the Faraday field into “electric” and “magnetic” fields — give us Gauss’ and [...]

Pingback by The Higgs Mechanism part 3: Gauge Symmetries « The Unapologetic Mathematician | July 18, 2012 |