## Group actions

Okay, now we’ve got all the setup for one big use of group theory.

Most mathematical structures come with some notion of symmetries. We can rotate a regular -sided polygon of a turn, or we can flip it over. We can rearrange the elements of a set. We can apply an automorphism of a group. The common thread in all these is a collection of reversible transformations. Performing one transformation and then the other is certainly also a transformation, so we can use this as a composition. The symmetries of a given structure form a group!

What if we paint one side of the above -gon black and the other white, so flipping it over definitely changes it. Then we can only rotate. The rotations are the collection of symmetries that preserve the extra structure of which side is which, and they form a subgroup of the group of all symmetries of the -gon. The symmetries of a structure preserving some *extra* structure form a subgroup!

As far as we’re concerned right now, mathematical structures are all built on sets. So the fundamental notion of symmetry is rearranging the elements of a set. Given a set , the set of all bijections from to itself is a group. We’ve actually seen a lot of these before. If is a finite set with elements, is the symmetric group on letters.

Now, a group action on a set is simply this: a homomorphism from to . That is, for each element in there is a bijection of and .

It’s important to note what seems like a switch here. It’s really due to the notation, but can easily seem confusing. What’s written on the right is “do the permutation corresponding to , then the one corresponding to “. So we have to think of the multiplication in as “first do , then do “.

In what follows I’ll often write as . The homomorphism property then reads

I’ll throw out a few definitions now, and follow up with examples in later posts.

We can slice up into subsets so that if and are in the same subset, for some , and not if they’re not in the same subset. In fact, this is rather like how we sliced up itself into cosets of . We call these slices the “orbits” of the action.

As an important special case of the principle that fixing additional structure induces subgroups, consider the “extra structure” of one identified point. We’re given an element of , and want to consider those transformations in which send to itself. Verify that this forms a subgroup of . We call it the “isotropy group” or the “stabilizer” of , and write it .

I’ll leave you to ponder this: if and are in the same -orbit, show that and are isomorphic.

You really want to repair that missing closing sub-tag in the end — it changes the layout of EVERYTHING else on the first page.

Comment by Mikael Johansson | February 21, 2007 |

Very odd.. I accidentally typed “sup” instead of “sub”, but Safari evidently knew what I meant…

Comment by John Armstrong | February 21, 2007 |

[…] “Tale of Groupoidification”. He really fleshes out this extension of the notion of group actions, and ties it into the concept of spans. I hope it’s not gushing too much to say that spans […]

Pingback by This Week's Finds #249 « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 9, 2007 |

[…] The analogue in ring theory for the idea of a group action is that of a module. Again we want every element of the ring to behave like a function on a set and […]

Pingback by Modules « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 21, 2007 |

[…] Finds. He continues his “Tale of Groupoidification”. It features a great comparison of group actions on sets and those on vector spaces (which we’ll get to soon enough). Even better, he gives a […]

Pingback by New This Week's Finds « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 29, 2007 |

[…] and group actions — categorically The theory of group actions looks really nice when we translate it into the language of categories. That’s what I plan to […]

Pingback by Groups and group actions — categorically « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 8, 2007 |

[…] is still beyond us at this point, but there are others. One nice place groupoids come up is from group actions. In fact, Baez is of the opinion that the groupoid viewpoint is actually more natural than the […]

Pingback by Groupoids (and more group actions) « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 9, 2007 |

[…] point we’ll call so that . It’s straightforward from here to show that this gives an action of the vector space (considered as an abelian group) on the affine space […]

Pingback by Affine Spaces « The Unapologetic Mathematician | July 16, 2008 |

[…] a set with some binary operation defined on it, sure, but what does it do? We’ve seen groups acting on sets before, where we interpret a group element as a permutation of an actual collection of elements. […]

Pingback by Group Representations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | October 23, 2008 |

[…] here’s the upshot: the general linear group acts on the hom-set by conjugation — basis changes. In fact, this is a representation of the group, […]

Pingback by Representations of a Polynomial Algebra « The Unapologetic Mathematician | October 30, 2008 |

[…] group on the vector space of matrices over by conjugation. What we want to consider now are the orbits of this group action. That is, given two matrices and , we will consider them equivalent if there […]

Pingback by Orbits of the General Linear Action on Matrices « The Unapologetic Mathematician | March 6, 2009 |

[…] Ising model of ferromagnetism has found some evidence they claim is linked to certain symmetry; an action of the Lie group on the space of states which preserves some interesting property or another. I […]

Pingback by Lie Groups in Nature « The Unapologetic Mathematician | January 11, 2010 |

[…] Weyl Group on Weyl Chambers With our latest lemmas in hand, we’re ready to describe the action of the Weyl group of a root system on the set of its Weyl chambers. Specifically, the action is […]

Pingback by The Action of the Weyl Group on Weyl Chambers « The Unapologetic Mathematician | February 5, 2010 |

[…] to existence. Given a vector , we consider its orbit — the collection of all the as runs over all elements of . We have to find a vector in this […]

Pingback by The Fundamental Weyl Chamber « The Unapologetic Mathematician | February 9, 2010 |

[…] Ising model of ferromagnetism has found some evidence they claim is linked to certain symmetry; an action of the Lie group on the space of states which preserves some interesting property or another. I […]

Pingback by Lie Groups in Nature | Drmathochist's Blog | August 28, 2010 |

[…] detailed subject. And since every finite group can be embedded in a permutation group — its action on itself by left multiplication permutes its own elements — and many natural symmetries come […]

Pingback by New Topic: The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Group « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 7, 2010 |

[…] and Representations From the module perspective, we’re led back to the concept of a group action. This is like a -module, but “discrete”. Let’s just write down the axioms for […]

Pingback by Group Actions and Representations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 16, 2010 |

[…] now multiplication on the left by shuffles around the cosets. That is, we have a group action of on the quotient set , and this gives us a permutation representation of […]

Pingback by Coset Representations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 20, 2010 |