The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider


One of the most useful examples of a group acting on a set comes directly from group theory itself. Let G be a group and H be a subgroup of G. The subgroup H acts on the set of all subgroups of G as follows.

If K is any subgroup of G and h is any element of H, then the set hKh^{-1} of elements of G of the form hkh^{-1} with k in K is another subgroup of G. Indeed, if we take two elements hkh^{-1} and hk'h^{-1} of this set, their product is hkh^{-1}hk'h^{-1}=hkk'h^{-1}, which is again of the proper form since kk' is in K. We call this subgroup the conjugation of K by h.

Given two elements of H we can check that (hh')K(hh')^{-1}=hh'Kh'^{-1}h^{-1}, so conjugating by hh' is the same as conjugating by h', then by h. That is, this defines an action of H on the set of all subgroups of G.

Even better, hKh^{-1} is not just another subgroup of G, it is isomorphic to K. In proving that hKh^{-1} is a subgroup we showed that the function sending k to hkh^{-1} is a homomorphism. We can undo it by conjugating by h^{-1}, so it’s an isomorphism. We say that two subgroups of G related by a conjugation are conjugate.

The subgroup of H sending K to itself — those h in H so that hKh^{-1}=K — is called the normalizer of K in H, written N_H(K). We can verify that K is a normal subgroup in N_G(K), and that K is normal in G exactly when N_G(K)=G.

One orbit is particularly interesting to consider: G is always sent to itself by conjugation. That is, given an element h of G the homomorphism sending g to hgh^{-1} is an automorphism of G. In fact, given any group G, the automorphisms of G themselves form a group, called {\rm Aut}(G). Conjugation gives us a homomorphism c from G to {\rm Aut}(G): given an element g, c(g) is the automorphism of conjugation by g.

We call automorphisms arising in this way “inner automorphisms”. The group {\rm Inn}(G) of inner automorphisms on G is the image of c in {\rm Aut}(G). If g is an element of G and f is any automorphism of G, then f\circ c(g)\circ f^{-1} is the automorphism sending x in G to


Which is just conjugation of x by f(g). This proves that {\rm Inn}(G) is normal in {\rm Aut}(G). The quotient {\rm Aut}(G)/{\rm Inn}(G) is the group of outer automorphisms {\rm Out}(G).

The kernel of c is the set of elements g so that gg'g^{-1}=g' for all g' in G. That is, for any g' we have gg'=g'g, so the kernel of c is the subgroup of G consisting of elements that commute with every element of G. We call this subgroup the center of G.

Now, consider the group S_n of permutations on n letters. Determine how this group acts on itself by conjugation. Write out some conjugations in cycle notation to get an idea of what the answer should be.

About these ads

February 22, 2007 - Posted by | Algebra, Group Actions, Group theory


  1. […] has a few immediate corollaries. Yesterday, I mentioned the normalizer NG(K) of a subgroup K. When a subgroup H acts on G by conjugation we call the […]

    Pingback by A few more facts about group actions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | February 24, 2007 | Reply

  2. […] left when you violently rip away the composition from a group and just leave behind its conjugation action. This is a set with an operation , and it’s already a quandle. The part of the […]

    Pingback by Quandles « The Unapologetic Mathematician | March 19, 2007 | Reply

  3. […] Flag varieties and Lie groups have a really interesting interaction. I’ll try to do the simplest example justice, and the rest are sort of similar. We take a vector space and consider the group of linear transformations with . Clearly this group acts on . If we pick a basis of we can represent each transformation as an matrix. Then there’s a subgroup of “upper triangular” matrices of the form check that the product of two such matrices is again of this form, and that their determinants are always . Of course if we choose a different basis, the transformations in this subgroup are no longer in this upper triangular form. We’ll have a different subgroup of upper triangular matrices. The subgroups corresponding to different bases are related, though — they’re conjugate! […]

    Pingback by Flag varieties « The Unapologetic Mathematician | March 21, 2007 | Reply

  4. […] most mathematicians have some handle on. We view it as a function of two variables. One runs over the conjugacy classes of the group, while the other runs over a list of (equivalence classes of) irreducible representations. It turns […]

    Pingback by Admissible Character Tables for Real Reductive Algebraic Groups « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 9, 2007 | Reply

  5. […] basis ? Then we get a new transformation and a new isomorphism of groups . But this gives us an inner automorphism of . Given a transformation , we get the transformation This composite sends to itself, and it […]

    Pingback by General Linear Groups — Generally « The Unapologetic Mathematician | October 22, 2008 | Reply

  6. […] For some more review, let’s recall the idea of conjugation in a group . We say that two elements and are “conjugate” if for some […]

    Pingback by Conjugates « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 10, 2010 | Reply

  7. […] two trivial ideals: and . Another example is the “center” — in analogy with the center of a group — which is the collection of all such that for all . That is, those for which the adjoint […]

    Pingback by Ideals of Lie Algebras « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 13, 2012 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 410 other followers

%d bloggers like this: