Direct Products of Groups
There are two sorts of products on groups that I’d like to discuss. Today I’ll talk about direct products.
The direct product says that we can take two groups, form the Cartesian product of their sets, and put the structure of a group on that. Given groups and
we form the group
as the set of pairs
with
in
and
in
. We compose them term-by-term:
. It can be verified that this gives us a group.
There’s a very interesting property about this group. It comes equipped with two homomorphisms, and
, the “projections” of
onto
and
, respectively. As one might expect,
, and similarly for
. Even better, let’s consider any other group
with homomorphisms
and
. There is a unique homomorphism
— defined by
— so that
and
. Here’s the picture.
The vertical arrow from to
is
, and I assert that that’s the only homomorphism from
to
so that both paths from
to
are the same, as are both paths from
to
. When we draw a diagram like this with groups on the points and homomorphisms for arrows, we say that the diagram “commutes” if any two paths joining the same point give the same homomorphism between those two groups.
To restate it again, has homomorphisms to
and
, and any other group
with a pair of homomorphisms to
and
has a unique homomorphism from
to
so that the above diagram commutes. This uniqueness means that has this property is unique up to isomorphism.
Let’s say two groups and
have this product property. That is, each has given homomorphisms to
and
, and given any other group with a pair of homomorphisms there is a unique homomorphism to
and one to
that make the diagrams commute (with
or
in the place of
). Then from the
diagram with
in place of
we get a unique homomorphism
. On the other hand, from the
diagram with
in place of
, we get a unique homomorphism
. Putting these two together we get homomorphisms
and
.
Now if we think of the diagram for with
itself in place of
, we see that there’s a unique homomorphism from
to itself making the diagram commute. We just made one called
, but the identity homomorphism on
also works, so they must be the same! Similarly,
must be the identity on
, so
and
are inverses of each other, and
and
are isomorphic!
So let’s look back at this whole thing again. I take two groups and
, and I want a new group
that has homomorphisms to
and
and so any other such group with two homomorphisms has a unique homomorphism to
. Any two groups satisfying this property are isomorphic, so if we can find any group satisfying this property we know that any other one will be essentially the same. The group structure we define on the Cartesian product of the sets
and
satisfies just such a property, so we call it the direct product of the two groups.
This method of defining things is called a “universal property”. The argument I gave to show that the product is essentially unique works for any such definition, so things defined to satisfy universal properties are unique (up to isomorphism) if they actually exist at all. This is a viewpoint on group theory that often gets left out of basic treatments of the subject, but one that I feel gets right to the heart of why the theory behaves the way it does. We’ll definitely be seeing more of it.