Algebras
May 8, 2007  Posted by John Armstrong  Ring theory
11 Comments »
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About this weblog
This is mainly an expository blath, with occasional highlevel excursions, humorous observations, rants, and musings. The mainline exposition should be accessible to the “Generally Interested Lay Audience”, as long as you trace the links back towards the basics. Check the sidebar for specific topics (under “Categories”).
I’m in the process of tweaking some aspects of the site to make it easier to refer back to older topics, so try to make the best of it for now.

Recent Posts
 The Submodule of Invariants
 More New Modules from Old
 New Modules from Old
 Reducible Modules
 Irreducible Modules
 Lie Algebra Modules
 All Derivations of Semisimple Lie Algebras are Inner
 Decomposition of Semisimple Lie Algebras
 Back to the Example
 The Radical of the Killing Form
 The Killing Form
 Cartan’s Criterion
 A Trace Criterion for Nilpotence
 Uses of the JordanChevalley Decomposition
 The JordanChevalley Decomposition (proof)
Blogroll
Art
Astronomy
Computer Science
Education
Mathematics
 A Dialogue on Infinity
 A Singular Continuity
 Ars Mathematica
 Carter and Complexity
 Curious Reasoning
 Fightin’ the resistance of matter
 God Plays Dice
 Good Math, Bad Math
 Gowers's Weblog
 Gyre&Gimble
 Intrinsically Knotted
 Low Dimensional Topology
 Mathematics and physics
 Mathematics under the Microscope
 Michi’s blog
 Really Hard Sums
 Rigorous Trivialities
 Secret Blogging Seminar
 Sketches of Topology
 Steven Strogatz
 Sumidiot
 The Everything Seminar
 The Museum of Mathematics
 The nCategory Café
 The Universe of Discourse
 Theoretical Atlas
 This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics
 Topological Musings
 What's new
Me
Philosophy
Physics
Politics
Science
RSS Feeds
Feedback
Got something to say? Anonymous questions, comments, and suggestions at Formspring.me!Subjects
Archives
Site info
The Unapologetic MathematicianThe Andreas04 Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
[…] one that we haven’t considered directly: let be a commutative ring with unit and let be an algebra over with unit. Then we have a homomorphism of rings sending to — the action of on the […]
Pingback by Pushouts and pullbacks « The Unapologetic Mathematician  June 14, 2007 
[…] mention the Bracket polynomial and the Jones polynomial. Jones was studying a certain kind of algebra when he realized that the defining relations for these algebras were very much like those of the […]
Pingback by What is Knot Homology? « The Unapologetic Mathematician  July 11, 2007 
[…] go any further into linear algebra. Specifically, we’ll need to know a few things about the algebra of polynomials. Specifically (and diverging from the polynomials discussed earlier) we’re […]
Pingback by Polynomials I « The Unapologetic Mathematician  July 28, 2008 
[…] And, of course, once we’ve got monoids and linearity floating around, we’re inexorably drawn — Serge would way we have an irresistable compulsion — to consider monoid objects in the category of modules. That is: algebras. […]
Pingback by Algebra Representations « The Unapologetic Mathematician  October 24, 2008 
[…] or not. We know that the linear maps from a vector space (of finite dimension ) to itself form an algebra over . We can pick a basis and associate a matrix to each of these linear transformations. It turns […]
Pingback by The Algebra of UpperTriangular Matrices « The Unapologetic Mathematician  February 5, 2009 
[…] We’re about to talk about certain kinds of algebras that have the added structure of a “grading”. It’s not horribly important at the […]
Pingback by Graded Objects « The Unapologetic Mathematician  October 23, 2009 
[…] and Symmetric Algebras There are a few graded algebras we can construct with our symmetric and antisymmetric tensors, and at least one of them will be […]
Pingback by Tensor and Symmetric Algebras « The Unapologetic Mathematician  October 26, 2009 
[…] we proceed with the differential geometry: Lie algebras. These are like “regular” associative algebras in that we take a module (often a vector space) and define a bilinear operation on it. This much is […]
Pingback by Lie Algebras « The Unapologetic Mathematician  May 17, 2011 
[…] Algebras from Associative Algebras There is a great source for generating many Lie algebras: associative algebras. Specifically, if we have an associative algebra we can build a lie algebra on the same […]
Pingback by Lie Algebras from Associative Algebras « The Unapologetic Mathematician  May 18, 2011 
[…] called and give it a bilinear operation which we write as . We often require such operations to be associative, but this time we impose the following two […]
Pingback by Lie Algebras Revisited « The Unapologetic Mathematician  August 6, 2012 
[…] off, we need an algebra over a field . This doesn’t have to be associative, as our algebras commonly are; all we […]
Pingback by Derivations « The Unapologetic Mathematician  August 10, 2012 