Another Carnival
The Secret Blogging Seminar is hosting the latest installment of the Carnival of Mathematics. They seem to have done a fair job of collecting links, with more (and more varied) entries than I remember seeing before. Enjoy.
December 2, 2007  Posted by John Armstrong  Uncategorized
3 Comments »
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About this weblog
This is mainly an expository blath, with occasional highlevel excursions, humorous observations, rants, and musings. The mainline exposition should be accessible to the “Generally Interested Lay Audience”, as long as you trace the links back towards the basics. Check the sidebar for specific topics (under “Categories”).
I’m in the process of tweaking some aspects of the site to make it easier to refer back to older topics, so try to make the best of it for now.

Recent Posts
 The Submodule of Invariants
 More New Modules from Old
 New Modules from Old
 Reducible Modules
 Irreducible Modules
 Lie Algebra Modules
 All Derivations of Semisimple Lie Algebras are Inner
 Decomposition of Semisimple Lie Algebras
 Back to the Example
 The Radical of the Killing Form
 The Killing Form
 Cartan’s Criterion
 A Trace Criterion for Nilpotence
 Uses of the JordanChevalley Decomposition
 The JordanChevalley Decomposition (proof)
Blogroll
Art
Astronomy
Computer Science
Education
Mathematics
 A Dialogue on Infinity
 A Singular Continuity
 Ars Mathematica
 Carter and Complexity
 Curious Reasoning
 Fightin’ the resistance of matter
 God Plays Dice
 Good Math, Bad Math
 Gowers's Weblog
 Gyre&Gimble
 Intrinsically Knotted
 Low Dimensional Topology
 Mathematics and physics
 Mathematics under the Microscope
 Michi’s blog
 Really Hard Sums
 Rigorous Trivialities
 Secret Blogging Seminar
 Sketches of Topology
 Steven Strogatz
 Sumidiot
 The Everything Seminar
 The Museum of Mathematics
 The nCategory Café
 The Universe of Discourse
 Theoretical Atlas
 This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics
 Topological Musings
 What's new
Me
Philosophy
Physics
Politics
Science
RSS Feeds
Feedback
Got something to say? Anonymous questions, comments, and suggestions at Formspring.me!Subjects
Archives
John, I have appreciated your help in the past and I would like to get your insight into yet another question I have concerning linear algebra.
What is the relationship between the set of all linear transformations on a vector space over a field F of dimension n and the set of all nxn matrices with entries from the same field F. Clearly, it is not a onetoone relation. There may be many, possibly an infinite number of matrices that can represent the same linear transformation with respect to different basis of the space. What exactly is the relation?
Thank you for your time,
Jonathan Greenberg
Comment by Jonathan Grennberg  December 11, 2007 
When you’re dealing with linear functions between free modules (all vector spaces — modules over a field — are free), you can pick a basis for each of the domain and range as I discuss here. Once you do, then any such linear transformation can be written down uniquely as a matrix with respect to those bases, as I discuss in that link. Also, given a choice of bases any matrix corresponds to exactly one linear transformation.
But as you notice, there’s that choice of basis. Changing the basis of a free module is the same as applying an invertible linear transformation from that module to itself. That is, is the space of linear transformations from a rank module to a rank module. Then there is an action of the group (invertible matrices with entries in ) on the one side, and an action of on the other. What you’re really asking about is what the set of transformations looks like once we quotient out by these group actions.
And that’s where the story gets complicated. Over an algebraically closed field (like the complex numbers), the answer is contained in the Jordan normal form, which is a standard part of any good seniorlevel linear algebra course. It gives a canonical representative of each orbit of the group action. Beyond that it’s a huge mess. Sorry I can’t be more accurate.
Comment by John Armstrong  December 11, 2007 
John, thank you for your insight into my question. I will have to think about your answer as I study linear algebra in more depth.
JG
Comment by Jonathan Greenberg  December 11, 2007 