Matrices I
May 20, 2008  Posted by John Armstrong  Algebra, Linear Algebra
7 Comments »
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About this weblog
This is mainly an expository blath, with occasional highlevel excursions, humorous observations, rants, and musings. The mainline exposition should be accessible to the “Generally Interested Lay Audience”, as long as you trace the links back towards the basics. Check the sidebar for specific topics (under “Categories”).
I’m in the process of tweaking some aspects of the site to make it easier to refer back to older topics, so try to make the best of it for now.

Recent Posts
 The Submodule of Invariants
 More New Modules from Old
 New Modules from Old
 Reducible Modules
 Irreducible Modules
 Lie Algebra Modules
 All Derivations of Semisimple Lie Algebras are Inner
 Decomposition of Semisimple Lie Algebras
 Back to the Example
 The Radical of the Killing Form
 The Killing Form
 Cartan’s Criterion
 A Trace Criterion for Nilpotence
 Uses of the JordanChevalley Decomposition
 The JordanChevalley Decomposition (proof)
Blogroll
Art
Astronomy
Computer Science
Education
Mathematics
 A Dialogue on Infinity
 A Singular Continuity
 Ars Mathematica
 Carter and Complexity
 Curious Reasoning
 Fightin’ the resistance of matter
 God Plays Dice
 Good Math, Bad Math
 Gowers's Weblog
 Gyre&Gimble
 Intrinsically Knotted
 Low Dimensional Topology
 Mathematics and physics
 Mathematics under the Microscope
 Michi’s blog
 Really Hard Sums
 Rigorous Trivialities
 Secret Blogging Seminar
 Sketches of Topology
 Steven Strogatz
 Sumidiot
 The Everything Seminar
 The Museum of Mathematics
 The nCategory Café
 The Universe of Discourse
 Theoretical Atlas
 This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics
 Topological Musings
 What's new
Me
Philosophy
Physics
Politics
Science
RSS Feeds
Feedback
Got something to say? Anonymous questions, comments, and suggestions at Formspring.me!Subjects
Archives
Site info
The Unapologetic MathematicianThe Andreas04 Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
[…] Einstein Summation Convention Look at the formulas we were using yesterday. There’s a lot of summations in there, and a lot of big sigmas. Those get really tiring to […]
Pingback by The Einstein Summation Convention « The Unapologetic Mathematician  May 21, 2008 
[…] Matrices II With the summation convention firmly in hand, we continue our discussion of matrices. […]
Pingback by Matrices II « The Unapologetic Mathematician  May 22, 2008 
[…] compose two morphisms by the process of matrix multiplication. If is an matrix in and is a matrix in , then their product is a matrix in (remember the […]
Pingback by The Category of Matrices I « The Unapologetic Mathematician  June 2, 2008 
[…] satisfies ), we construct the column vector (here ). But we’ve already established that matrix multiplication represents composition of linear transformations. Further, it’s straightforward to see that the linear transformation corresponding to a […]
Pingback by The Category of Matrices III « The Unapologetic Mathematician  June 23, 2008 
[…] vector space comes equipped with a basis , where has a in the th place, and elsewhere. And so we can write any such transformation as an […]
Pingback by The General Linear Groups « The Unapologetic Mathematician  October 20, 2008 
[…] Okay, back to linear algebra and inner product spaces. I want to look at the matrix of a linear map between finitedimensional inner product […]
Pingback by Matrix Elements « The Unapologetic Mathematician  May 29, 2009 
[…] the space of tuples of complex numbers — and that linear transformations are described by matrices. Composition of transformations is reflected in matrix multiplication. That is, for every […]
Pingback by Some Review « The Unapologetic Mathematician  September 8, 2010 