The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

The Polarization Identities

If we have an inner product on a real or complex vector space, we get a notion of length called a “norm”. It turns out that the norm completely determines the inner product.

Let’s take the sum of two vectors v and w. We can calculate its norm-squared as usual:

\displaystyle\begin{aligned}\lVert v+w\rVert^2&=\langle v+w,v+w\rangle\\&=\langle v,v\rangle+\langle v,w\rangle+\langle w,v\rangle+\langle w,w\rangle\\&=\lVert v\rVert^2+\lVert w\rVert^2+\langle v,w\rangle+\overline{\langle v,w\rangle}\\&=\lVert v\rVert^2+\lVert w\rVert^2+2\Re\left(\langle v,w\rangle\right)\end{aligned}

where \Re(z) denotes the real part of the complex number z. If z is already a real number, it does nothing.

So we can rewrite this equation as

\displaystyle\Re\left(\langle v,w\rangle\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\lVert v+w\rVert^2-\lVert v\rVert^2-\lVert w\rVert^2\right)

If we’re working over a real vector space, this is the inner product itself. Over a complex vector space, this only gives us the real part of the inner product. But all is not lost! We can also work out

\displaystyle\begin{aligned}\lVert v+iw\rVert^2&=\langle v+iw,v+iw\rangle\\&=\langle v,v\rangle+\langle v,iw\rangle+\langle iw,v\rangle+\langle iw,iw\rangle\\&=\lVert v\rVert^2+\lVert iw\rVert^2+\langle v,iw\rangle+\overline{\langle v,iw\rangle}\\&=\lVert v\rVert^2+\lVert w\rVert^2+2\Re\left(i\langle v,w\rangle\right)\\&=\lVert v\rVert^2+\lVert w\rVert^2-2\Im\left(\langle v,w\rangle\right)\end{aligned}

where \Im(z) denotes the imaginary part of the complex number z. The last equality holds because


so we can write

\displaystyle\Im\left(\langle v,w\rangle\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\lVert v\rVert^2+\lVert w\rVert^2-\lVert v+iw\rVert^2\right)

We can also write these identities out in a couple other ways. If we started with v-w, we could find the identities

\displaystyle\Re\left(\langle v,w\rangle\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\lVert v\rVert^2+\lVert w\rVert^2-\lVert v-w\rVert^2\right)
\displaystyle\Im\left(\langle v,w\rangle\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\lVert v-iw\rVert^2-\lVert v\rVert^2-\lVert w\rVert^2\right)

Or we could combine both forms above to write

\displaystyle\Re\left(\langle v,w\rangle\right)=\frac{1}{4}\left(\lVert v+w\rVert^2-\lVert v-w\rVert^2\right)
\displaystyle\Im\left(\langle v,w\rangle\right)=\frac{1}{4}\left(\lVert v-iw\rVert^2-\lVert v+iw\rVert^2\right)

In all these ways we see that not only does an inner product on a real or complex vector space give us a norm, but the resulting norm completely determines the inner product. Different inner products necessarily give rise to different norms.


April 23, 2009 - Posted by | Algebra, Linear Algebra


  1. […] the other hand, what if we have a norm that satisfies this parallelogram law? Then we can use the polarization identities to define a unique inner […]

    Pingback by The Parallelogram Law « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 24, 2009 | Reply

  2. […] now we have the polarization identities to work with! The real and imaginary parts of are completely determined in terms of expressions […]

    Pingback by Positive-Definite Transformations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | July 13, 2009 | Reply

  3. […] if for all vectors , then we can use the polarization identities to conclude that […]

    Pingback by Normal Transformations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 5, 2009 | Reply

  4. […] at a given point, while the line element is a quadratic function of a single vector. However, the polarization identities will allow you to recover the bilinear function from the quadratic […]

    Pingback by Bad Language: Metric vs Metric Tensor vs Matrix Form vs Line Element « The Language of Bad Physics | October 21, 2009 | Reply

  5. […] verify our assertion for the product , we turn and recall the polarization identities from when we worked with inner products. Remember, they told us that if we know how to calculate […]

    Pingback by Adding and Multiplying Measurable Real-Valued Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 7, 2010 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: