## Orthonormal Bases

Now that we have the Gram-Schmidt process as a tool, we can use it to come up with orthonormal bases.

Any vector space with finite dimension has a finite basis . This is exactly what it means for to have dimension . And now we can apply the Gram-Schmidt process to turn this basis into an orthonormal basis .

We also know that any linearly independent set can be expanded to a basis. In fact, we can also extend any orthonormal collection of vectors to an orthonormal basis. Indeed, if is an orthonormal collection, we can add the vectors to fill out a basis. Then when we apply the Gram-Schmidt process to this basis it will start with , which is already normalized. It then moves on to , which is orthonormal with , and so on. Each of the is left unchanged, and the are modified to make them orthonormal with the existing collection.

[…] to see that , take an orthonormal basis for . Then we can expand it to an orthonormal basis of . But now I say that is a basis for . Clearly they’re linearly independent, so we just […]

Pingback by Orthogonal Complements « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 4, 2009 |

[…] say we’ve got a unitary transformation and an orthonormal basis . We can write down the matrix as […]

Pingback by Unitary and Orthogonal Matrices and Orthonormal Bases « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 7, 2009 |

[…] basis of and hit it with to get a bunch of orthonormal vectors in (orthonormal because . Then fill these out to an orthonormal basis of all of . Just set to be the span of all the new basis vectors, which is […]

Pingback by The Singular Value Decomposition « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 17, 2009 |

[…] any form whatsoever. We know that we can do this by picking a basis of and declaring it to be orthonormal. We don’t anything fancy like Gram-Schmidt, which is used to find orthonormal bases for a […]

Pingback by Maschke’s Theorem « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 28, 2010 |

[…] of class functions also has a nice inner product. Of course, we could just declare the basis to be orthonormal, but that’s not quite what we’re going to do. Instead, we’ll […]

Pingback by Class Functions « The Unapologetic Mathematician | October 15, 2010 |