Orthogonal transformations
Given a form on a vector space represented by the transformation
and a linear map
, we’ve seen how to transform
by the action of
. That is, the space of all bilinear forms is a vector space which carries a representation of
. But given a particular form
, what is the stabilizer of
? That is, what transformations in
send
back to itself.
Before we answer this, let’s look at it in a slightly different way. Given a form we have a way of pairing vectors in
to get scalars. On the other hand, if we have a transformation
we could use it on the vectors before pairing them. We’re looking for those transformations so that for every pair of vectors the result of the pairing by
is the same before and after applying
.
So let’s look at the action we described last time: the form is sent to
. So we’re looking for all
so that
We say that such a transformation is -orthogonal, and the subgroup of all such transformations is the “orthogonal group”
. Sometimes, since the vector space
is sort of implicit in the form
, we abbreviate the group to
.
Now there’s one particular orthogonal group that’s particularly useful. If we’ve got an inner-product space (the setup for having our bra-ket notation) then the inner product itself is a form, and it’s described by the identity transformation. That is, the orthogonality condition in this case is that
A transformation is orthogonal if its adjoint is the same as its inverse. This is the version of orthogonality that we’re most familiar with. Commonly, when we say that a transformation is “orthogonal” with no qualification about what form we’re using, we just mean that this condition holds.
Let’s take a look at this last condition geometrically. We use the inner product to define a notion of (squared-)length and a notion of (the cosine of) angle
. So let’s transform the space by
and see what happens to our inner product, and thus to lengths and angles.
First off, note that no matter what we use, the transformation in the middle is self-adjoint and positive-definite, and so the new form is symmetric and positive-definite, and thus defines another inner product. But when is it the same inner product? When
, of course! For then we have
So orthogonal transformations are exactly those which preserve the notions of length and angle defined by the inner product. Geometrically, they correspond to rotations and reflections that change orientations, but leave lengths of vectors the same, and leave the angle between any pair of vectors the same.