Multilinear Functionals
Okay, time for a diversion from all this calculus. Don’t worry, there’s tons more ahead.
We’re going to need some geometric concepts tied to linear algebra, and before we get into that we need to revisit an old topic: tensor powers and the subspaces of symmetric and antisymmetric tensors. Specifically, how do all of these interact with duals. Through these post we’ll be working with a vector space over a field
, which at times will be assumed to be finite-dimensional, but will not always be.
First, we remember that elements of the dual space are called “linear functionals”. These are
-linear functions from the vector space
to the base field
. Similarly, a “
-multilinear functional” is a function
that takes
vectors from
and gives back a field element in
in a way that’s
-linear in each variable. That is,
for scalars and
, and for any index
. Equivalently, by the defining universal property of tensor products, this is equivalent to a linear function
— a linear functional on
. That is, the space of
-multilinear functionals is the dual space
.
There’s a good way to come up with -multilinear functionals. Just take
linear functionals and sew them together. That is, if we have an
-tuple of functionals
we can define an
-multilinear functional by the formula
We just feed the th tensorand
into the
th functional
and multiply all the resulting field elements together. Since field multiplication is multilinear, so is this operation. Then the universal property of tensor products tells us that this mapping from
-tuples of linear functionals to
-multilinear functionals is equivalent to a unique linear map from the
th tensor power
. It’s also easy to show that this map has a trivial kernel.
This is not to say that dualization and tensor powers commute. Indeed, in general this map is a proper monomorphism. But it turns out that if is finite-dimensional, then it’s actually an isomorphism. Just count the dimensions — if
has dimension
then each space has dimension
— and use the rank-nullity theorem to see that they must be isomorphic. That is, every
-multilinear functional is a linear combination of the ones we can construct from
-tuples of linear functionals.
Now we can specialize this result. We define a multilinear functional to be symmetric if its value is unchanged when we swap two of its inputs. Equivalently, it commutes with the symmetrizer. That is, it must kill everything that the symmetrizer kills, and so must really define a linear functional on the subspace of symmetric tensors. That is, the space of symmetric -multilinear functionals is the dual space
. We can construct such symmetric multilinear functionals by taking
linear functionals as before and symmetrizing them. This gives a monomorphism
, which is an isomorphism if
is finite-dimensional.
Similarly, we define a multilinear functional to be asymmetric or “alternating” if its value changes sign when we swap two of its inputs. Then it commutes with the antisymmetrizer, must kill everything the antisymmetrizer kills, and descends to a linear functional on the subspace of antisymmetric tensors. As before, we can construct just such an antisymmetric -multilinear functional by antisymmetrizing
linear functionals, and get a monomorphism
. And yet again, this map is an isomorphism if
is finite-dimensional.