Extensions of Measures

Oops, forgot to post this this earlier…

We can put together what we’ve been doing recently to state the following theorem:

If $\mu$ is a $\sigma$ -finite measure on the ring $\mathcal{R}$ , then there is a unique measure $\bar{\mu}$ on the $\sigma$ -ring $\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{R})$ extending $\mu$ . That is, if $E\in\mathcal{R}\subseteq\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{R})$ , then $\bar{\mu}(E)=\mu(E)$ . Further, the extended measure $\bar{\mu}$ is also $\sigma$ -finite.

The existence is straightforward. We can induce an outer measure, and then restrict it to get $\bar{\mu}$ . It’s straightforward to verify from the definitions that $\bar{\mu}(E)=\mu(E)$ . And we know that since $\mu$ is $\sigma$ -finite, so is $\mu^*$ , and thus $\bar{\mu}$ .

What we need to show is that $\bar{\mu}$ is unique. To this end, let $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$ be two measures on $\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{R})$ that both extend $\mu$ . Let $\mathcal{M}\subseteq\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{R})$ be the class of sets on which $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$ agree; this obviously contains $\mathcal{R}$ .

Now, if one of these two measures — say $\mu_1$ — is finite, and if $\{E_i\}_{i=1}^\infty\subseteq\mathcal{M}$ is a monotone sequence of sets on which $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$ agree, then the limit of this sequence is again in $\mathcal{M}$ . Indeed, since measures are continuous, we must have

$\displaystyle\mu_1\left(\lim\limits_{i\to\infty}E_i\right)=\lim\limits_{i\to\infty}\mu_1(E_i)$

and similarly for $\mu_2$ . Since $\mu_1$ is finite, and $\mu_2$ agrees with $\mu_1$ on $\mathcal{M}$ , we have a sequence of finite measures $\mu_1(E_i)=\mu_2(E_i)$ . The limits of these sequences must then agree, and so $\lim_iE_i\in\mathcal{M}$ as well. Thus $\mathcal{M}$ is a monotone class. Since it contains $\mathcal{R}$ , it must contain $\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{R})$ , and thus $\mu_1=\mu_2$ .

On the other hand, neither measure may be finite. In this case, let $A\in\mathcal{R}$ be some fixed set of finite measure. Now $\mathcal{R}\cap A$ — the collection of intersections of sets in $\mathcal{R}$ with $A$ — is again a ring, and $\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{R})\cap A$ is the smallest $\sigma$ -ring containing it. Restricting $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$ to $\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{R})\cap A$ gives finite measures, and we can use the argument above.

Now every set $E\in\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{R})$ can be covered by a countable, pairwise disjoint collection of sets $A_i\in\mathcal{R}$ . For each one, we have $E_i=E\cap A_i\in\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{R})\cap A_i$ , and so we must find $\mu_1(E_i)=\mu_2(E_i)$ . From here, countable additivity finishes the theorem.

In light of the uniqueness of this extension, we will just call the extended measure $\mu$ again, rather than $\bar{\mu}$ .

About these ads

April 6, 2010 - Posted by John Armstrong | Analysis, Measure Theory

5 Comments »

[…] of Measures We’ve shown that we can uniquely extend a -finite measure on a ring to a unique -finite measure on the -ring . But, of course, we […]

Pingback by Completions of Measures « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 6, 2010 | Reply
[…] Sets of Finite Measure So, we’ve got a -finite measure on a ring , and we extend it to a measure on the -ring . But often it’s a lot more convenient to work with itself than […]

Pingback by Approximating Sets of Finite Measure « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 7, 2010 | Reply
[…] we can use this method of inner measures as an alternative approach to our extension theorems. If is a -finite measure on a ring , and if is the induced outer measure on , then for […]

Pingback by Using Measurable Covers and Kernels II « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 13, 2010 | Reply
[…] a measure on the ring of finite disjoint unions of semiclosed intervals. Now we want to apply our extension and completion […]

Pingback by Lebesgue Measure « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 19, 2010 | Reply
[…] the two measures agree on . But our extension theorem tells us that a measure on is uniquely determined by its values on . And thus our assertion holds […]

Pingback by Lebesgue Measure and Affine Transformations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 22, 2010 | Reply

About this weblog

This is mainly an expository blath, with occasional high-level excursions, humorous observations, rants, and musings. The main-line exposition should be accessible to the “Generally Interested Lay Audience”, as long as you trace the links back towards the basics. Check the sidebar for specific topics (under “Categories”).

I’m in the process of tweaking some aspects of the site to make it easier to refer back to older topics, so try to make the best of it for now.

RSS Feeds

RSS - Posts
RSS - Comments
Feedback

Got something to say? Anonymous questions, comments, and suggestions at Formspring.me!
Subjects
Archives

April 2010

M T W T F S S

« Mar May »

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30
Search for:

The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider