The Unapologetic Mathematician

Borel Sets and Lebesgue Measure

Let’s consider some of the easy properties of the Borel sets and Lebesgue measure we introduced yesterday.

First off, every countable set of real numbers is a Borel set of measure zero. In particular, every single point $\{a\}$ is a Borel set. Indeed, $\{a\}$ can be written as the countable intersection

$\displaystyle\{a\}=\bigcap\limits_{n=1}^\infty\left[a,a+\frac{1}{n}\right)$

so it’s a Borel set. Further, monotonicity tells us that

$\displaystyle\mu\left(\{a\}\right)=\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\mu\left(\left[a,a+\frac{1}{n}\right)\right)=\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}=0$

and so the singleton $\{a\}$ has measure zero. But $\mu$ is countably additive, so given any countable collection $A\subseteq\mathbb{R}$ the measure $\mu(A)$ is the sum of the measures of the individual points, each of which is zero.

Next, as I said when I introduced semiclosed intervals, we could have started with open intervals, but the details would have been messier. Now we can see that the $\sigma$-ring $\mathcal{S}$ generated by the collection $\mathcal{P}$ of semiclosed intervals is the same as that generated by the collection $\mathcal{U}$ of all open sets.

We can see, in particular, that each open interval $\left(a,b\right)$ is a Borel set. Indeed, the point $\{a\}$ is a Borel set, as is the semiclosed interval $\left[a,b\right)$, and we have the relation $\left(a,b\right)=\left[a,b\right)\setminus\{a\}$. Every other open set in $\mathbb{R}$ is a countable union of open intervals, and so they’re all Borel sets as well. Conversely, we could write

$\displaystyle\{a\}=\bigcap\limits_{n=1}^\infty\left(a-\frac{1}{n},a+\frac{1}{n}\right)$

and find the singleton $\{a\}$ in the $\sigma$-ring generated by $\mathcal{U}$. Then we can write $\left[a,b\right)=\left(a,b\right)\cup\{a\}$ and find every semiclosed interval in this $\sigma$-ring as well. And thus $\mathcal{S}=\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{P})\subseteq\mathcal{S}(\mathcal{U})$

We can also tie our current measure back to the concept of outer Lebesgue measure we introduced before. Back then, we defined the “volume” of a collection of open intervals to be the sum of the “volumes” of the intervals themselves. We defined the outer measure of a set to be the infimum of the volumes of finite open covers. And, indeed, this is exactly the outer measure $\mu^*$ corresponding to Lebesgue measure $\mu$.

Remember that the outer measure $\mu^*(E)$ is defined for a set $E\subseteq\mathbb{R}$ by

$\displaystyle\mu^*(E)=\inf\left\{\mu(F)\vert F\in\mathcal{S},E\subseteq F\right\}$

Since $\mathcal{U}\subseteq\mathcal{S}$, we have the inequality

$\displaystyle\mu^*(E)\leq\inf\left\{\mu(U)\vert U\in\mathcal{S},E\subseteq F\right\}$

On the other hand, if $\epsilon$ is any positive number, then by the definition of $\mu^*$ we can find a sequence $\left\{\left[a_n,b_n\right)\right\}$ of semiclosed intervals so that

$\displaystyle E\subseteq\bigcup\limits_{n=1}^\infty\left[a_n,b_n\right)$

and

$\displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty(b_n-a_n)\leq\mu^*(E)+\frac{\epsilon}{2}$

We can thus widen each of these semiclosed intervals just a bit to find

$\displaystyle E\subseteq\bigcup\limits_{n=1}^\infty\left(a_n-\frac{\epsilon}{2^{n+1}},b_n\right)=U\in\mathcal{U}$

and

$\displaystyle\mu(U)\leq\sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty(b_n-a_n)+\frac{\epsilon}{2}\leq\mu^*(E)+\epsilon$

Since $\epsilon$ was arbitrary, we find that $\mu(U)\leq\mu^*(E)$. And, thus, that

$\displaystyle\mu^*(E)=\inf\left\{\mu(U)\vert U\in\mathcal{S},E\subseteq F\right\}$

In effect, we’ve replaced the messily-defined “volume” of an open cover by the more precise Lebesgue measure $\mu$, but the result is the same. The “outer Lebesgue measure” from our investigations of multiple integrals is the same as the outer measure induced by our new Lebesgue measure.

April 20, 2010 - Posted by | Analysis, Measure Theory

1. I’m still reading and pondering these with delight. Haven’t commented much lately, as had to complete a grant proposal, make progress in the quantum computing theory in a novel I’m writing, and be the key eyewitness in a legal malpractice lawsuit. And — for complicated job-search reasons — formally applied to the Caltech Math department, where I got my B.S. in 1973, for Grad School next year (albeit I’ve been an adjunct professor in the interim and published a great deal). Your unapologetic blogmaster and some of his readers are also sensitive to the job search mess during Global Recession.

Comment by Jonathan Vos Post | April 21, 2010 | Reply

2. […] . This sends the semiclosed interval to the interval . But this is a Borel set: , and the singletons are Borel sets. Thus we see that the reflection sends Borel sets to Borel sets. It should also be clear that it […]

Pingback by Lebesgue Measure and Affine Transformations « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 22, 2010 | Reply

3. […] is the class of open sets. We already know […]

Pingback by Lebesgue Measurable Sets « The Unapologetic Mathematician | April 23, 2010 | Reply

4. […] binary expansions, which are exactly the rational numbers. But this is a countable set, and countable sets have Lebesgue measure zero. Consequently, we find that . Since , there must be some positive measure in in order to make up […]

Pingback by Composing Real-Valued Measurable Functions II « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 5, 2010 | Reply

5. […] things only go wrong at the one point, and the singleton has measure zero. That is, the sequence converges almost everywhere to the function with constant value . The […]

Pingback by Egoroff’s Theorem « The Unapologetic Mathematician | May 17, 2010 | Reply