The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

Fatou’s Lemma

Today we prove Fatou’s Lemma, which is a precursor to the Fatou-Lebesgue theorem, and an important result in its own right.

If \{f_n\} is a sequence of non-negative integrable functions then the function defined pointwise as

\displaystyle f_*(x)=\liminf\limits_{n\to\infty} f_n(x)

is also integrable, and we have the inequality

\displaystyle\int f_*\,d\mu\leq\liminf\limits_{n\to\infty}\int f_n\,d\mu

In fact, the lemma is often stated for a sequence of measurable functions and concludes that f_* is measurable (along with the inequality), but we already know that the limit inferior of a sequence of measurable functions is measurable, and so the integrable case is the most interesting part for us.

So, we define the functions

\displaystyle g_n(x)=\inf\limits_{i\geq n}f_i(x)

so that each g_n is integrable, each g_n\leq f_n and the sequence \{g_n\} is pointwise increasing. Monotonicity tells us that for each n we have

\displaystyle\int g_n\,d\mu\leq\int f_n\,d\mu

and it follows that

\displaystyle\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\int g_n\,d\mu\leq\liminf\limits_{n\to\infty}\int f_n\,d\mu<\infty

We also know that


which means we can bring the monotone convergence theorem to bear. This tells us that

\displaystyle\int f_*\,d\mu=\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\int g_n\,d\mu\leq\liminf\limits_{n\to\infty}\int f_n\,d\mu

as asserted.

If it happened that f_* were not integrable, then some of the f_n would have to be only measurable — not integrable — themselves. And it couldn’t just be a finite number of them, or we could just drop them from the sequence. No, there would have to be an infinite subsequence of non-integrable f_n, which would mean an infinite subsequence of their integrals would diverge to \infty. Thus when we take the limit inferior of the integrals we get \infty, as we do for the integral of f itself, and the inequality still holds.

June 16, 2010 - Posted by | Analysis, Measure Theory


  1. […] dominates the sequence , the sequence will be non-negative. Fatou’s lemma then tells us […]

    Pingback by The Fatou-Lebesgue Theorem « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 17, 2010 | Reply

  2. […] their positive and negative parts. Then you can prove the monotone convergence theorem, followed by Fatou’s lemma, and then the Fatou-Lebesgue theorem, which leads to dominated convergence theorem, and we’re […]

    Pingback by An Alternate Approach to Integration « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 18, 2010 | Reply

  3. […] every , and since we find that . Then Fatou’s lemma shows us that . Thus the -finite case is true as […]

    Pingback by Some Continuous Duals « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 3, 2010 | Reply

  4. Would you mind explaining why each g_n is integrable? Many thanks!

    Comment by rich | December 7, 2012 | Reply

  5. Sorry, rich, I don’t have a solid answer off the top of my head (I was never really an analyst). My intuition is that the infimum of any (countable?) collection of integrable functions is integrable.

    Comment by John Armstrong | December 9, 2012 | Reply

    • Thanks for the reply! I think your intuition is correct – I’ll poke around in my copy of Apostol to see if I can find a substantiating theorem.

      Comment by rich | December 10, 2012 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 431 other followers

%d bloggers like this: