Partitions in Measure Algebras
Let be a totally finite measure algebra, and write
for the maximal element. Without loss of generality, we can assume that
is normalized so that
.
We define a “partition” of an element
to be a finite set of “disjoint” elements of
whose “union” is
. Remember, of course, that the elements of
are not (necessarily) sets, so the set language is suggestive, but not necessarily literal. That is, if
then
and
The “norm” of a partition
is the maximum of the numbers
. If
is a partition of
and if
is any element of
below
, then
is a partition of
.
If and
are partitions, then we write
if each element in
is contained in an element of
. We say that a sequence of partitions is “decreasing” if
for each
. A sequence of partitions is “dense” if for every
and every positive number
there is some
and an element
so that
, and
is exactly the union of some elements in
. That is, we can use the elements in a fine enough partition in the sequence to approximate any element of
as closely as we want.
Now, if is a totally finite, non-atomic measure algebra, and if
is a dense, decreasing sequence of partitions of
, then
. Indeed, the sequence of norms
is monotonic and bounded in the interval
, and so it must have a limit. We will assume that this limit is some positive number
, and find a contradiction.
So if then at least one of the
must be big enough that
for all
. Otherwise the sequence of norms would descend below
and that couldn’t be the limit. Let
be just such an element, and consider the sequence
of partitions of
. The same argument is just as true, and we find another element
from the partition
, and so on.
Now, let be the intersection of the sequence
. By assumption, each of the
has
, and so
as well. Since
is non-atomic,
can’t be an atom, and so there must be an
with
. This element must be either contained in or disjoint from each element of each partition
.
We can take smaller than either
or
. Now no set made up of the union of any elements of any partition
can have a distance less than
from
. This shows that the sequence of partitions cannot be dense, which is the contradiction we were looking for. Thus the limit of the sequence of norms is zero.
[…] interval , let be the class of Borel sets on , and let be Lebesgue measure. If is a sequence of partitions of the maximal element of the measure algebra into intervals, and if the limit of the sequence of […]
Pingback by The Measure Algebra of the Unit Interval « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 25, 2010 |