The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

Characters of Permutation Representations

Let’s take (\mathbb{C}S,\rho) to be a permutation representation coming from a group action on a finite set S that we’ll also call \rho. It’s straightforward to calculate the character of this representation.

Indeed, the standard basis that comes from the elements of S gives us a nice matrix representation:


On the left \rho(g) is the matrix of the action on \mathbb{C}S, while on the right it’s the group action on the set S. Hopefully this won’t be too confusing. The matrix entry in row s and column t is 1 if \rho(g) sends s to t, and it’s 0 otherwise.

So what’s the character \chi_\rho(g)? It’s the trace of the matrix \rho(g), which is the sum of all the diagonal elements:

\displaystyle\mathrm{Tr}\left(\rho(g)\right)=\sum\limits_{s\in S}\rho(g)_s^s=\sum\limits_{s\in S}\rho(g)_s^s=\sum\limits_{s\in S}\delta_{\rho(g)s,s}

This sum counts up 1 for each point s that \rho(g) sends back to itself, and 0 otherwise. That is, it counts the number of fixed points of the permutation \rho(g).

As a special case, we can consider the defining representation V^\mathrm{def} of the symmetric group S_n. The character \chi^\mathrm{def} counts the number of fixed points of any given permutation. For instance, in the case n=3 we calculate:


In particular, the character takes the value 3 on the identity element e\in G, and the degree of the representation is 3 as well. This is no coincidence; \chi(e) will always be the degree of the representation in question, since any matrix representation of degree n must send e to the n\times n identity matrix, whose trace is n. This holds both for permutation representations and for any other representation.

October 19, 2010 - Posted by | Algebra, Group theory, Representation Theory, Representations of Symmetric Groups


  1. […] pass from representations to their characters. Of course, this isn’t much of a stretch, since we saw that the character of a representation includes information about the dimension: […]

    Pingback by Consequences of Orthogonality « The Unapologetic Mathematician | October 25, 2010 | Reply

  2. […] The nice thing here is that it’s a permutation representation, and that means we have a shortcut to calculating its character: is the number of fixed point of the action of on the standard basis […]

    Pingback by Decomposing the Left Regular Representation « The Unapologetic Mathematician | November 17, 2010 | Reply

  3. […] we’ve constructed. Since these come from actions of on various sets, we have our usual shortcut to calculate their characters: count fixed […]

    Pingback by Characters of Young Tabloid Modules (first pass) « The Unapologetic Mathematician | December 15, 2010 | Reply

  4. thank you

    Comment by خرید کریو | December 17, 2014 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: