## Intertwinors from Semistandard Tableaux Span, part 3

Now we are ready to finish our proof that the intertwinors coming from semistandard generalized tableaux span the space of all intertwinors between these modules.

As usual, pick any intertwinor and write

Now define the set to consist of those semistandard generalized tableaux so that for some appearing in this sum with a nonzero coefficient. This is called the “lower order ideal” generated by the in the sum. We will prove our assertion by induction on the size of this order ideal.

If is empty, then must be the zero map. Indeed, our lemmas showed that if is not the zero map, then at least one semistandard shows up in the above sum, and this would itself belong to . And of course the zero map is contained in any span.

Now, if is not empty, then there is at least some semistandard with in the sum. Our lemmas even show that we can pick one so that is maximal among all the tableaux in the sum. Let’s do that and define a new intertwinor:

I say that is with removed.

Every appearing in has , since if is semistandard then is the largest column equivalence class in . Thus must be a subset of since we can’t be introducing any new nonzero coefficients.

Our lemmas show that if , then must appear with the same coefficient in both and . That is, they must be cancelled off by the subtraction. Since is maximal there’s nothing above it that might keep it inside the ideal, and so .

So by induction we conclude that is contained within the span of the generated by semistandard tableaux, and thus must be as well.

You know what? This makes no sense to me. I mean, it shouldn’t, as I don’t have the prerequisite knowledge to formulate an understanding…

… but isn’t that a HUGE issue with mathematics? Why can’t this information be explained in laymen’s terms? Isn’t that the point of this blog?

Why do mathematicians constantly shroud their art form?

Comment by Haakon | February 15, 2011 |

Haakon, have you tried tracing back the links to the more foundational material?

Comment by John Armstrong | February 15, 2011 |

[…] Now we’ve finished our proof that the intertwinors coming from semistandard tableauxspan the space of all […]

Pingback by Kostka Numbers « The Unapologetic Mathematician | February 17, 2011 |