## Germs of Functions

Let’s take the structure sheaves we defined last time and consider the stalks at a point . It turns out that since we’re working with sheaves of -algebras, we can sort of shortcut the messy limit process.

As before, given some open neighborhood of , we let be the algebra of smooth functions — as smooth as is itself — on . Now we define to be the ideal of those functions which vanish on some neighborhood of . Then we define the quotient

Notice that we have effectively pushed our limiting process into the definition of the ideal , where for each open neighborhood of we get an ideal of functions vanishing on . The ideal we care about is the union over all such neighborhoods , and the process of taking this union is effectively a limit.

Anyhow, there’s still the possibility that this depends on the from which we started. But this is actually not the case; we get a uniquely defined algebra no matter which neighborhood of we start from.

Indeed, I say that there is an isomorphism . In the one direction, this is simply induced by the restriction map — if two functions are equal on some neighborhood of in , then they’re certainly equal on some neighborhood of in . And this restriction is just as clearly injective, since if two functions are equivalent in then they must agree on some neighborhood of , which means they were already equivalent in .

The harder part is showing that this map is surjective, and thus an isomorphism. But given , let be an open neighborhood of whose closure is contained in — we can find one since must contain a neighborhood of homeomorphic to a ball in , and we can certainly find within such a neighborhood. Anyhow, we know that there exists a bump function which is identically on and supported within . We can thus define a smooth function on all of by setting inside and elsewhere. Since and agree on the neighborhood of , they are equivalent in , and thus every equivalence class in has a representative coming from .

We write the stalk as , or sometimes if the manifold is clear from context, and we call the equivalence classes of functions in this algebra “germs” of functions. Thus a germ subsumes not just the value of a function at a point , but is behavior in an “infinitesimal neighborhood” around . Some authors even call the structure sheaf of a manifold — especially a complex analytic manifold (which we haven’t really discussed yet) — the “sheaf of germs” of functions on the manifold, which is a little misleading since the germs properly belong to the *stalks* of the sheaf. Luckily, this language is somewhat outmoded.

Are you missing an equals or defined to be sign in the first displayed formula (the quotient)?

Comment by Robert | March 25, 2011 |

sorry, fixed

Comment by John Armstrong | March 26, 2011 |

Just checking that ‘algebra’ in par. 2 is something meeting this definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associative_algebra

which seems to fit, but as things get more complicated, uncertainties multiply …

Comment by Avery D Andrews | March 27, 2011 |

Yes: like a ring, but built on a vector space, not just a set.

Comment by John Armstrong | March 27, 2011 |

[…] we take a manifold with structure sheaf . We pick some point and get the stalk of germs of functions at . This is a real algebra, and we define a “tangent vector at […]

Pingback by Tangent Vectors at a Point « The Unapologetic Mathematician | March 29, 2011 |