## Line Integrals

We now define some particular kinds of integrals as special cases of our theory of integrals over manifolds. And the first such special case is that of a line integral.

Consider an oriented curve in the manifold . We know that this is a singular -cube, and so we can pair it off with a -form . Specifically, we pull back to on the interval and integrate.

More explicitly, the pullback is evaluated as

That is, for a , we take the value of the -form at the point and the tangent vector and pair them off. This gives us a real-valued function which we can integrate over the interval.

So, why do we care about this particularly? In the presence of a metric, we have an equivalence between -forms and vector fields . And specifically we know that the pairing is equal to the inner product — this is how the equivalence is defined, after all. And thus the line integral looks like

Often the inner product is written with a dot — usually called the “dot product” of vectors — in which case this takes the form

We also often write as a “vector differential-valued function”, in which case we can write

Of course, we often parameterize a curve by a more general interval than , in which case we write

This expression may look familiar from multivariable calculus, where we first defined line integrals. We can now see how this definition is a special case of a much more general construction.

[…] any -form on the image of — in particular, given an defined on — we can define the line integral of over . We already have a way of evaluating line integrals: pull the -form back to the parameter […]

Pingback by The Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals « The Unapologetic Mathematician | October 24, 2011 |

[…] flip side of the line integral is the surface […]

Pingback by (Hyper-)Surface Integrals « The Unapologetic Mathematician | October 27, 2011 |

[…] Stokes’ theorem only works in dimension , where the differential can take us straight from a line integral over a -dimensional region to a surface integral over an -dimensional […]

Pingback by The Classical Stokes Theorem « The Unapologetic Mathematician | November 23, 2011 |

[…] if we have a curve that starts at a point and ends at a point then fundamental theorem of line integrals makes it easy to […]

Pingback by Conservative Vector Fields « The Unapologetic Mathematician | December 15, 2011 |

[…] We calculate the work done by a force in moving a particle along a path is given by the line integral […]

Pingback by Electromotive Force « The Unapologetic Mathematician | January 13, 2012 |