Homotopies as Morphisms
We can think of homotopies between maps as morphisms in a category that has the maps as objects. In terms of the movie analogy, the composition is obvious: run the movie that takes you from map to map
, then run the one that takes you from map
to map
.
In practice, the way we make these intuitive concepts explicit tend to get in the way. For one thing, the naïve approach would be to run the first movie from time to time
, and then the second from time
to time
. But this gives us a function
instead of
. The usual way to handle this is by rescaling — run the first movie twice as fast from
to
, then the second movie twice as fast from
to
.
The problem with this is that it makes associativity weird. Let’s say we have homotopies ,
, and
we want to compose. If we write
Then we have
and
these two are indeed homotopies from to
, but they’re not the same homotopy! Associativity doesn’t seem to work for this composition.
The easy answer is to wave our hands and say they’re the same “up to reparameterization”. That is, there is some (invertible) function so that
It’s not hard to figure it out as an exercise.
The fact that we’re talking about two different things being “really the same” is a clue that there’s some higher categorical structure here that we’re “decategorifying” and forgetting about. In particular, we could flesh out the idea of reparameterizations as morphisms between homotopies, but that will quickly become more complicated than I want to get into.
Still, it’s worth pointing out that the reparameterization in the above exercise behaves like an associator, like we talked about in the context of monoidal categories. And, just like in that case, we will find left and right identity reparameterizations.
What’s the obvious homotopy to use as the identity on a map ? Clearly it’s just
, independent of
. I’ll leave the identity reparameterizations as another exercise. The upshot is that we have identity homotopies — “up to reparameterization” — for each map, which completes the definition of our category.
[…] time, while talking about homotopies as morphisms I said that I didn’t want to get too deeply into the reparameterization thing because it […]
Pingback by Homotopies as 2-Morphisms « The Unapologetic Mathematician | November 30, 2011 |