# The Unapologetic Mathematician

## A Family of Nontrivial Homology Classes (part 2)

We continue investigating the differential forms we defined last time. Recall that we started with the position vector field $P(p)=\mathcal{I}_pp$ and use the interior product to produce the $n$-form $\hat{\omega}=\iota_P(du^0\wedge\dots\wedge du^n)$ on the punctured $n+1$-dimensional space $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}\setminus\{0\}$. We restrict this form to the $n$-dimensional sphere $S^n$ and then pull back along the retraction mapping $\pi:p\mapsto\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}$ to get the form $\omega=\pi^*\hat\omega$.

I’ve asserted that $\omega=\frac{1}{\lvert p\rvert^n}\hat{\omega}$, and now we will prove it; let $\{v_1,\dots,v_n\}$ be $n$ tangent vectors at $p$ and calculate \displaystyle\begin{aligned}{}[\omega(p)]&(v_1,\dots,v_n)\\&=[[\pi^*\hat{\omega}](p)](v_1,\dots,v_n)\\&=[\hat{\omega}(\pi(p))](\pi_{*p}v_1,\dots,\pi_{*p}v_n)\\&=\left[\hat{\omega}\left(\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}\right)\right]\left(\frac{1}{\lvert p\rvert}\mathcal{I}_{\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}}\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}v_1,\dots,\frac{1}{\lvert p\rvert}\mathcal{I}_{\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}}\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}v_n\right)\\&=\frac{1}{\lvert p\rvert^n}\left[\hat{\omega}\left(\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}\right)\right]\left(\mathcal{I}_{\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}}\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}v_1,\dots,\mathcal{I}_{\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}}\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}v_n\right)\\&=\frac{1}{\lvert p\rvert^n}\left[[du^0\wedge\dots\wedge du^n]\left(\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}\right)\right]\left(P\left(\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}\right),\mathcal{I}_{\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}}\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}v_1,\dots,\mathcal{I}_{\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}}\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}v_n\right)\\&=\frac{1}{\lvert p\rvert^n}\left[[du^0\wedge\dots\wedge du^n]\left(\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}\right)\right]\left(\mathcal{I}_{\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}}\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}P(p),\mathcal{I}_{\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}}\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}v_1,\dots,\mathcal{I}_{\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}}\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}v_n\right)\\&=\frac{1}{\lvert p\rvert^n}[du^0\wedge\dots\wedge du^n]\left(\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}P(p),\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}v_1,\dots,\mathcal{I}_p^{-1}v_n\right)\\&=\frac{1}{\lvert p\rvert^n}\left[[du^0\wedge\dots\wedge du^n](p)\right](P(p),v_1,\dots,v_n)\\&=\left[\left[\frac{1}{\lvert p\rvert^n}\hat{\omega}\right](p)\right](v_1,\dots,v_n)\end{aligned}

as asserted. Along the way we’ve used two things that might not be immediately apparent. First: the derivative $\pi_*$ works by transferring a vector from $\mathcal{T}_p\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ to $\mathcal{T}_{\frac{p}{\lvert p\rvert}}\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ and scaling down by a factor of $\frac{1}{\lvert p\rvert}$, which is a consequence of the linear action of $\pi_*$ and the usual canonical identifications. Second: the volume form on $\mathcal{T}_p\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ can be transferred to essentially the same form on $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ itself by using the canonical identification $\mathcal{I}_p$.

December 20, 2011 - Posted by | Differential Topology, Topology