The Radical of the Killing Form
The first and most important structural result using the Killing form regards its “radical”. We never really defined this before, but it’s not hard: the radical of a binary form on a vector space
is the subspace consisting of all
such that
for all
. That is, if we regard
as a linear map
, the radical is the kernel of this map. Thus we see that
is nondegenerate if and only if its radical is zero; we’ve only ever dealt much with nondegenerate bilinear forms, so we’ve never really had to consider the radical.
Now, the radical of the Killing form is more than just a subspace of
; the associative property tells us that it’s an ideal. Indeed, if
is in the radical and
are any other two Lie algebra elements, then we find that
thus is in the radical as well.
We recall that there was another “radical” we’ve mentioned: the radical of a Lie algebra is its maximal solvable ideal. This is not necessarily the same as the radical of the Killing form, but we can see that the radical of the form is contained in the radical of the algebra. By definition, if is in the radical of
and
is any other Lie algebra element we have
Cartan’s criterion then tells us that the radical of is solvable, and is thus contained in
, the radical of the algebra. Immediately we conclude that if
is semisimple — if
— then the Killing form must be nondegenerate.
It turns out that the converse is also true. In fact, the radical of contains all abelian ideals
. Indeed, if
and
then
, and the square of this map sends
into
. Thus
is nilpotent, and thus has trace zero, proving that
, and that
is contained in the radical of
. So if the Killing form is nondegenerate its radical is zero, and there can be no abelian ideals of
. But the derived series of
eventually hits zero, and its last nonzero term is an abelian ideal of
. This can only work out if
is already zero, and thus
is semisimple.
So we have a nice condition for semisimplicity: calculate the Killing form and check that it’s nondegenerate.
[…] taking its determinant to find . Since this is nonzero, we conclude that is nondegenerate, which we know means that is semisimple — at least in fields where . Share this:StumbleUponDiggRedditLike […]
Pingback by Back to the Example « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 7, 2012 |
[…] to the Killing form . The associativity of shows that is also an ideal, just as we saw for the radical. Indeed, the radical of is just . Anyhow, Cartan’s criterion again shows that the […]
Pingback by Decomposition of Semisimple Lie Algebras « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 8, 2012 |
[…] of . Then we can define to be the subspace orthogonal (with respect to ) to , and the fact that the Killing form is nondegenerate tells us that , and thus […]
Pingback by All Derivations of Semisimple Lie Algebras are Inner « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 11, 2012 |